Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Allow selinux=? and enforcing=? kernel flags to be controlled
On 12/08/09 16:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This is a pretty uncontroversial patch which just allows the
selinux=? and enforcing=? flags on the kernel command line
to be controlled.
Currently libguestfs unconditionally passes selinux=0. By default
this patch does the same thing, but allows programs to enable SELinux
in the kernel and/or set it to enforcing mode.
Patch looks ok except that we shouldn't include the enforcing flag. I
can't conceive of any reason we'd want SELinux in enforcing mode in the
appliance. If selinux=1, then assume enforcing=0.
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team
M: +44 (0)7977 267231
GPG ID: D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490