On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:47:57AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 22:10:10 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> ---
> v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> v2v/test-v2v-print-source.expected | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml b/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml
> index 6032c31..2dee274 100644
> --- a/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml
> +++ b/v2v/parse_libvirt_xml.ml
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ let parse_libvirt_xml ?conn xml =
> let xpathctx = Xml.xpath_new_context doc in
> let xpath_string = xpath_string xpathctx
> and xpath_int = xpath_int xpathctx
> - and xpath_int_default = xpath_int_default xpathctx
> + (*and xpath_int_default = xpath_int_default xpathctx*)
> and xpath_int64_default = xpath_int64_default xpathctx in
>
> let hypervisor =
> @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ let parse_libvirt_xml ?conn xml =
> | Some s -> s in
> let memory = xpath_int64_default "/domain/memory/text()" (1024L *^
1024L) in
> let memory = memory *^ 1024L in
> - let vcpu = xpath_int_default "/domain/vcpu/text()" 1 in
>
> let cpu_vendor = xpath_string "/domain/cpu/vendor/text()" in
> let cpu_model = xpath_string "/domain/cpu/model/text()" in
> @@ -73,6 +72,21 @@ let parse_libvirt_xml ?conn xml =
> let cpu_cores = xpath_int "/domain/cpu/topology/@cores" in
> let cpu_threads = xpath_int "/domain/cpu/topology/@threads" in
>
> + (* Get the <vcpu> field from the input XML. If not set then
> + * try calculating it from the <cpu> <topology> node. If that's
> + * not set either, then assume 1 vCPU.
> + *)
> + let vcpu = xpath_int "/domain/vcpu/text()" in
> + let vcpu =
> + match vcpu, cpu_sockets, cpu_cores, cpu_threads with
> + | Some vcpu, _, _, _ -> vcpu
> + | None, None, None, None -> 1
> + | None, _, _, _ ->
> + let sockets = match cpu_sockets with None -> 1 | Some v -> v in
> + let cores = match cpu_cores with None -> 1 | Some v -> v in
> + let threads = match cpu_threads with None -> 1 | Some v -> v in
> + sockets * cores * threads in
Should there be a sockets * cores * threads <> vcpu check as well?
Yes, it's already included in v2v/v2v.ml in:
[PATCH 4/4] v2v: Pass CPU vendor, model and topology from source to target.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-March/msg00185.html
However it's only a warning because we don't want to fail the
conversion if this metadata (which is basically informational) is
wrong.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW