On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:43:04AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This preliminary patch series adds a libvirt backend to libguestfs.
> It's for review only because although it launches the guest OK, there
> are some missing features that need to be implemented.
I did some appliance boot timings of libvirt vs direct qemu boot from
libguestfs, and essentially libvirt makes no measurable difference,
which is all good news.
Oh, I'm a little surprised at that. When I switched my KVM
sandbox hacks from a quick proof of concept, over to using
libvirt, I saw about a 300-500ms overhead from libvirt in
the startup process. My presumption is that this overhead
is primarily from libvirt invoking qemu -help several times
to figure out supported options. When we switch to caching
that info though, I'd expect there to be little measurable
impact from libvirt
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|