3:42 p.m.
- Use more friendly output with GiB and MiB/s
- Measure time per operation, providing finer grain stats
- Add total stats for understanding system throughput
- Add missing stats for flush
I hope that these changes will help to understand and improve virt-v2v
performance.
Changes since v1:
- Keep bytes values
- Increase precision to 0.001 GiB and 0.001 MiB/s
- Add total stats
- Show time before size/rate for more consistent format
- Streamline using new record_stat() and print_stat()
v1 was here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-November/msg00345.html
Nir Soffer (3):
filters: stats: Add size in GiB, show rate in MiB/s
filters: stats: Measure time per operation
filters: stats: Add flush stats
filters/stats/stats.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
3:42 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 1/3] filters: stats: Add size in GiB, show rate in MiB/s
I find bytes and bits-per-second unhelpful and hard to parse.
Add also size in GiB, and show rate in MiB per second. This works
well for common disk images and storage.
Here is an example run with this change:
$ ./nbdkit --foreground \
--unix /tmp/nbd.sock \
--exportname '' \
--filter stats \
file file=/var/tmp/dst.img \
statsfile=/dev/stderr \
--run 'qemu-img convert -p -n -f raw -O raw -T none /var/tmp/fedora-30.img
nbd:unix:/tmp/nbd.sock'
(100.00/100%)
elapsed time: 2.055 s
write: 1271 ops, 1219244032 bytes, 1.136 GiB, 565.710 MiB/s
zero: 1027 ops, 5223206912 bytes, 4.864 GiB, 2423.486 MiB/s
extents: 1 ops, 2147483136 bytes, 2.000 GiB, 996.399 MiB/s
---
filters/stats/stats.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/filters/stats/stats.c b/filters/stats/stats.c
index ffc367c..6bef65c 100644
--- a/filters/stats/stats.c
+++ b/filters/stats/stats.c
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
#include "cleanup.h"
#include "tvdiff.h"
+#define MiB 1048576.0
+#define GiB 1073741824.0
+#define USEC 1000000.0
+
static char *filename;
static bool append;
static FILE *fp;
@@ -70,29 +74,35 @@ static stat extents_st = { "extents" };
static stat cache_st = { "cache" };
static inline double
-calc_bps (uint64_t bytes, int64_t usecs)
+calc_rate (uint64_t bytes, int64_t usecs)
{
- return 8.0 * bytes / usecs * 1000000.;
+ return bytes / MiB / usecs * USEC;
}
static inline void
print_stat (const stat *st, int64_t usecs)
{
if (st->ops > 0)
- fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %" PRIu64 " bytes, %g
bits/s\n",
- st->name, st->ops, st->bytes, calc_bps (st->bytes, usecs));
+ fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %" PRIu64 " bytes, %.3f
GiB, %.3f MiB/s\n",
+ st->name,
+ st->ops,
+ st->bytes,
+ st->bytes / GiB,
+ calc_rate (st->bytes, usecs));
}
static inline void
print_stats (int64_t usecs)
{
- fprintf (fp, "elapsed time: %g s\n", usecs / 1000000.);
+ fprintf (fp, "elapsed time: %.3f s\n", usecs / USEC);
+
print_stat (&pread_st, usecs);
print_stat (&pwrite_st, usecs);
print_stat (&trim_st, usecs);
print_stat (&zero_st, usecs);
print_stat (&extents_st, usecs);
print_stat (&cache_st, usecs);
+
fflush (fp);
}
--
2.21.0
3:42 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 2/3] filters: stats: Measure time per operation
Previously we measured the total time and used it to calculate the rate
of different operations. This is misleading and hiding the real
throughput. Change single operation stats to use the time spent in this
operation.
To understand total system throughput, show also new "total" stats,
summing ops, bytes of other operations, and using the total time. This
works well for copying images to/from nbdkit.
Here is an example run with this change:
$ ./nbdkit --foreground \
--unix /tmp/nbd.sock \
--exportname '' \
--filter stats \
file file=/var/tmp/dst.img \
statsfile=/dev/stderr \
--run 'qemu-img convert -p -n -f raw -O raw -T none /var/tmp/fedora-30.img
nbd:unix:/tmp/nbd.sock'
(100.00/100%)
total: 2299 ops, 2.190 s, 6442450944 bytes, 6.000 GiB, 2804.977 MiB/s
write: 1271 ops, 0.359 s, 1219244032 bytes, 1.136 GiB, 3237.466 MiB/s
zero: 1027 ops, 0.012 s, 5223206912 bytes, 4.864 GiB, 398658.526 MiB/s
extents: 1 ops, 0.000 s, 2147483136 bytes, 2.000 GiB, 113777750.651 MiB/s
This shows that the actual time waiting for storage was only 0.4
seconds, but elapsed time was 2.1 seconds. I think the missing time is
in flush() which we do not measure yet.
---
filters/stats/stats.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/filters/stats/stats.c b/filters/stats/stats.c
index 6bef65c..2c92c65 100644
--- a/filters/stats/stats.c
+++ b/filters/stats/stats.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ typedef struct {
const char *name;
uint64_t ops;
uint64_t bytes;
+ uint64_t usecs;
} stat;
/* This lock protects all the stats. */
@@ -80,28 +81,42 @@ calc_rate (uint64_t bytes, int64_t usecs)
}
static inline void
-print_stat (const stat *st, int64_t usecs)
+print_stat (const stat *st)
{
if (st->ops > 0)
- fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %" PRIu64 " bytes, %.3f
GiB, %.3f MiB/s\n",
+ fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %.3f s, %" PRIu64 "
bytes, %.3f GiB, %.3f MiB/s\n",
st->name,
st->ops,
+ st->usecs / USEC,
st->bytes,
st->bytes / GiB,
- calc_rate (st->bytes, usecs));
+ calc_rate (st->bytes, st->usecs));
}
static inline void
print_stats (int64_t usecs)
{
- fprintf (fp, "elapsed time: %.3f s\n", usecs / USEC);
-
- print_stat (&pread_st, usecs);
- print_stat (&pwrite_st, usecs);
- print_stat (&trim_st, usecs);
- print_stat (&zero_st, usecs);
- print_stat (&extents_st, usecs);
- print_stat (&cache_st, usecs);
+ const stat total_st = {
+ .name = "total",
+ .ops = pread_st.ops
+ + pwrite_st.ops
+ + trim_st.ops
+ + zero_st.ops
+ + extents_st.ops,
+ .bytes = pread_st.bytes
+ + pwrite_st.bytes
+ + trim_st.bytes
+ + zero_st.bytes,
+ .usecs = usecs,
+ };
+
+ print_stat (&total_st);
+ print_stat (&pread_st);
+ print_stat (&pwrite_st);
+ print_stat (&trim_st);
+ print_stat (&zero_st);
+ print_stat (&extents_st);
+ print_stat (&cache_st);
fflush (fp);
}
@@ -187,11 +202,18 @@ stats_config_complete (nbdkit_next_config_complete *next, void
*nxdata)
"statsappend=<BOOL> True to append to the log (default false).\n"
static inline void
-record_stat (stat *st, uint32_t count)
+record_stat (stat *st, uint32_t count, struct timeval *start)
{
+ struct timeval end;
+ uint64_t usecs;
+
+ gettimeofday(&end, NULL);
+ usecs = tvdiff_usec(start, &end);
+
ACQUIRE_LOCK_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE (&lock);
st->ops++;
st->bytes += count;
+ st->usecs += usecs;
}
/* Read. */
@@ -200,10 +222,12 @@ stats_pread (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
void *handle, void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset,
uint32_t flags, int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->pread (nxdata, buf, count, offset, flags, err);
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&pread_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&pread_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
@@ -214,10 +238,12 @@ stats_pwrite (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
const void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset,
uint32_t flags, int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->pwrite (nxdata, buf, count, offset, flags, err);
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&pwrite_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&pwrite_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
@@ -228,10 +254,12 @@ stats_trim (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->trim (nxdata, count, offset, flags, err);
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&trim_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&trim_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
@@ -242,10 +270,12 @@ stats_zero (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->zero (nxdata, count, offset, flags, err);
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&zero_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&zero_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
@@ -256,14 +286,16 @@ stats_extents (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
struct nbdkit_extents *extents, int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->extents (nxdata, count, offset, flags, extents, err);
/* XXX There's a case for trying to determine how long the extents
* will be that are returned to the client (instead of simply using
* count), given the flags and the complex rules in the protocol.
*/
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&extents_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&extents_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
@@ -274,10 +306,12 @@ stats_cache (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
int *err)
{
+ struct timeval start;
int r;
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
r = next_ops->cache (nxdata, count, offset, flags, err);
- if (r == 0) record_stat (&cache_st, count);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&cache_st, count, &start);
return r;
}
--
2.21.0
3:42 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 3/3] filters: stats: Add flush stats
flush is usually called once but it can take significant time, so we
need to include it.
Here is an example run with this change:
$ ./nbdkit --foreground \
--unix /tmp/nbd.sock \
--exportname '' \
--filter stats \
file file=/var/tmp/dst.img \
statsfile=/dev/stderr \
--run 'qemu-img convert -p -n -f raw -O raw -T none /var/tmp/fedora-30.img
nbd:unix:/tmp/nbd.sock'
(100.00/100%)
total: 2299 ops, 2.172 s, 6442450944 bytes, 6.000 GiB, 2829.295 MiB/s
write: 1271 ops, 0.356 s, 1219244032 bytes, 1.136 GiB, 3269.711 MiB/s
zero: 1027 ops, 0.012 s, 5223206912 bytes, 4.864 GiB, 431052.118 MiB/s
extents: 1 ops, 0.000 s, 2147483136 bytes, 2.000 GiB, 107789447.985 MiB/s
flush: 2 ops, 1.156 s
---
filters/stats/stats.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/filters/stats/stats.c b/filters/stats/stats.c
index 2c92c65..1d0f242 100644
--- a/filters/stats/stats.c
+++ b/filters/stats/stats.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static stat trim_st = { "trim" };
static stat zero_st = { "zero" };
static stat extents_st = { "extents" };
static stat cache_st = { "cache" };
+static stat flush_st = { "flush" };
static inline double
calc_rate (uint64_t bytes, int64_t usecs)
@@ -83,14 +84,20 @@ calc_rate (uint64_t bytes, int64_t usecs)
static inline void
print_stat (const stat *st)
{
- if (st->ops > 0)
- fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %.3f s, %" PRIu64 "
bytes, %.3f GiB, %.3f MiB/s\n",
+ if (st->ops > 0) {
+ fprintf (fp, "%s: %" PRIu64 " ops, %.3f s",
st->name,
st->ops,
- st->usecs / USEC,
- st->bytes,
- st->bytes / GiB,
- calc_rate (st->bytes, st->usecs));
+ st->usecs / USEC);
+
+ if (st->bytes > 0)
+ fprintf (fp, ", %" PRIu64 " bytes, %.3f GiB, %.3f MiB/s",
+ st->bytes,
+ st->bytes / GiB,
+ calc_rate (st->bytes, st->usecs));
+
+ fprintf (fp, "\n");
+ }
}
static inline void
@@ -117,6 +124,7 @@ print_stats (int64_t usecs)
print_stat (&zero_st);
print_stat (&extents_st);
print_stat (&cache_st);
+ print_stat (&flush_st);
fflush (fp);
}
@@ -263,6 +271,21 @@ stats_trim (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
return r;
}
+/* Flush. */
+static int
+stats_flush (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
+ void *handle, uint32_t flags,
+ int *err)
+{
+ struct timeval start;
+ int r;
+
+ gettimeofday (&start, NULL);
+ r = next_ops->flush (nxdata, flags, err);
+ if (r == 0) record_stat (&flush_st, 0, &start);
+ return r;
+}
+
/* Zero. */
static int
stats_zero (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
@@ -325,6 +348,7 @@ static struct nbdkit_filter filter = {
.pread = stats_pread,
.pwrite = stats_pwrite,
.trim = stats_trim,
+ .flush = stats_flush,
.zero = stats_zero,
.extents = stats_extents,
.cache = stats_cache,
--
2.21.0
4:28 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 3/3] filters: stats: Add flush stats
I have pushed some parts of these patches in order to reduce the delta
between your patches and upstream. However still some problems with
the series:
Patch 1: Same problem with scale as discussed before.
Patch 2: At least the documentation needs to be updated since it no
longer matches what is printed. The idea of collecting the time taken
in each operation is good on its own, so I pushed that part of it
along with small const-correctness and whitespace fixes:
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/f280530d7d042d5e8f100125ab061...
Why don't we show the total time and time / operation on each line of
output (ie. per operation), instead of synthesizing the total by
adding up reads and writes?
Patch 3: The idea of collecting flush stats is good so I pushed that
part, as well as updating the documentation:
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/8adf601835aee3779e278e13cae04...
I omitted the "if (st->bytes > 0)" part of the patch so this shows
"0
bytes" which is of course wrong but we can fix that later.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
5:45 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 3/3] filters: stats: Add flush stats
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I have pushed some parts of these patches in order to reduce the delta
between your patches and upstream. However still some problems with
the series:
Patch 1: Same problem with scale as discussed before.
I addressed this here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-December/msg00011.html
Patch 2: At least the documentation needs to be updated since it no
longer matches what is printed. The idea of collecting the time taken
in each operation is good on its own, so I pushed that part of it
along with small const-correctness and whitespace fixes:
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/f280530d7d042d5e8f100125ab061...
Thanks for pushing it.
Why don't we show the total time and time / operation on each
line of
output (ie. per operation), instead of synthesizing the total by
adding up reads and writes?
I think that synthesizing totals give better view on total application
throughput, and add
information that was not available before, like total number of ops.
Showing two rate
values per operation looks confusing to me.
But how about this:
----------------------------------------------
total: 2299 ops, 2.172 s, 6.00 GiB, 2.76 GiB/s
520.73 MiB/s write, 2.23 GiB/s zero
-----------------------------------------------
write: 1271 ops, 0.356 s, 1.13 GiB, 3.19 GiB/s
zero: 1027 ops, 0.012 s, 4.86 GiB, 405.00 GiB/s
extents: 1 ops, 0.000 s, 2.00 GiB, 485.29 GiB/s
flush: 2 ops, 1.252 s
Patch 3: The idea of collecting flush stats is good so I pushed that
part, as well as updating the documentation:
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/8adf601835aee3779e278e13cae04...
Nice, I missed the pod file.
Nir
6:48 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 3/3] filters: stats: Add flush stats
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 01:45:54AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones
<rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> I have pushed some parts of these patches in order to reduce the delta
> between your patches and upstream. However still some problems with
> the series:
>
> Patch 1: Same problem with scale as discussed before.
I addressed this here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-December/msg00011.html
> Patch 2: At least the documentation needs to be updated since it no
> longer matches what is printed. The idea of collecting the time taken
> in each operation is good on its own, so I pushed that part of it
> along with small const-correctness and whitespace fixes:
>
>
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/f280530d7d042d5e8f100125ab061...
Thanks for pushing it.
> Why don't we show the total time and time / operation on each line of
> output (ie. per operation), instead of synthesizing the total by
> adding up reads and writes?
I think that synthesizing totals give better view on total application
throughput, and add
information that was not available before, like total number of ops.
Showing two rate
values per operation looks confusing to me.
But how about this:
----------------------------------------------
total: 2299 ops, 2.172 s, 6.00 GiB, 2.76 GiB/s
520.73 MiB/s write, 2.23 GiB/s zero
-----------------------------------------------
write: 1271 ops, 0.356 s, 1.13 GiB, 3.19 GiB/s
zero: 1027 ops, 0.012 s, 4.86 GiB, 405.00 GiB/s
extents: 1 ops, 0.000 s, 2.00 GiB, 485.29 GiB/s
flush: 2 ops, 1.252 s
Yes, better than before.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
9 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH nbdkit v2 3/3] filters: stats: Add flush stats
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 2:48 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 01:45:54AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:28 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have pushed some parts of these patches in order to reduce the delta
> > between your patches and upstream. However still some problems with
> > the series:
> >
> > Patch 1: Same problem with scale as discussed before.
>
> I addressed this here:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-December/msg00011.html
>
> > Patch 2: At least the documentation needs to be updated since it no
> > longer matches what is printed. The idea of collecting the time taken
> > in each operation is good on its own, so I pushed that part of it
> > along with small const-correctness and whitespace fixes:
> >
> >
https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/commit/f280530d7d042d5e8f100125ab061...
>
> Thanks for pushing it.
>
> > Why don't we show the total time and time / operation on each line of
> > output (ie. per operation), instead of synthesizing the total by
> > adding up reads and writes?
>
> I think that synthesizing totals give better view on total application
> throughput, and add
> information that was not available before, like total number of ops.
> Showing two rate
> values per operation looks confusing to me.
>
> But how about this:
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> total: 2299 ops, 2.172 s, 6.00 GiB, 2.76 GiB/s
> 520.73 MiB/s write, 2.23 GiB/s zero
> -----------------------------------------------
> write: 1271 ops, 0.356 s, 1.13 GiB, 3.19 GiB/s
> zero: 1027 ops, 0.012 s, 4.86 GiB, 405.00 GiB/s
> extents: 1 ops, 0.000 s, 2.00 GiB, 485.29 GiB/s
> flush: 2 ops, 1.252 s
Yes, better than before.
I'll send v3 implementing this then.
1815
days inactive
1819
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Nir Soffer -
Nir Soffer -
Richard W.M. Jones