On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:34 PM Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 On 08/18/2018 03:09 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
 > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 >
 >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:44 PM Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>>>    #ifdef FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE
 >>>> -  r = do_fallocate (h->fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, offset, count);
 >>>> -  if (r == -1 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP) {
 >>>> -    nbdkit_error ("zero: %m");
 >>>> +  if (h->can_zero_range) {
 >>>> +    r = do_fallocate (h->fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, offset, count);
 >>>> +    if (r== 0)
 >>>
 >>> Spacing is off.
 >>>
 >>
 > It does look off in my mail client (inbox), but looks fine (2 spaces
 > indentation)
 > in my editor.
 Not the leading spaces, but the asymmetric space around '=='. 
Thanks, got it finally :-)
 (Yes,
 Thunderbird is known to have a display bug where lines prefixed with
 space show at a different indentation levels than lines prefixed with -
 or +, which makes patch review via Thunderbird a bit more awkward than
 it should be - but that's not what I was complaining about)
 --
 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
 Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266 <(919)%20301-3266>
 Virtualization:  
qemu.org | 
libvirt.org