Re: [Libguestfs] Re: libguestfs performance

On 7 déc. 2009, at 10:57, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:08:38PM +0100, Pierre Riteau wrote: >> For a project of mine I would like to create VMs from tarballs of >> root filesystems. I would like to use libguestfs since this is >> exactly what the tar2vm.sh guestfish recipe does. >> >> However, I need to extract tarballs that are in the hundreds of >> megabytes, but my tests showed that performance is very low, both >> with tgz-in and with guestmount (sorry I don't have the numbers any >> more, but it was something like more than one hour to extract a >> tarball containing a Debian Lenny installation). >> >> Is there any way to drastically improve libguestfs' performance? > > First of all, read: > > http://libguestfs.org/FAQ.html#slow > > Using tar-in/tgz-in to copy the tarball into the appliance is always > going to be slow. I would think you should get better performance if > you write the tarball into an ISO first, and attach that. Something > like: > > mkisofs -JR -o cd.iso the_tarball.tar.gz > > guestfish -a guest.img -a cd.iso > [...] >> <fs> mkmountpoint /guest >> <fs> mkmountpoint /cd > [...] >> <fs> mount /dev/sdb /cd > [...] >> <fs> debug sh "tar xcf /cd/the_tarball.tar.gz /guest" I got it to work using the following sequence: $ guestfish -a guest.img -a cd.iso run sfdiskM /dev/sda "," mkfs ext3 /dev/sda1 mkmountpoint /guest mkmountpoint /cd mount /dev/sda1 /guest mount /dev/sdb /cd debug sh "tar -C /sysroot/guest -xzf /sysroot/cd/the_tarball.tar.gz" This is much better (on my test system it writes at about 15 MB/s). However, it is still far from what the hardware can do (more than 60 MB/s).