On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:55:07PM -0700, David Konerding wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get libguestfs-test-tool working on ubuntu. The first
problem I had was that HiveX won't compile on ubuntu to due to some missing
symbols (rpl-getopt, I see this has already been reported). Second problem
is that if HiveX is not available, guestfish doesn't link because code
refers to symbols which aren't compiled into libguestfs (I was able to work
around this by #ifdeffing references to those functions).
Which version of Ubuntu is this?
hivex should be in Ubuntu already, thanks to Hilko Bengen:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libhivex-dev
The problem with missing hivex/pcre causing libguestfs builds to break
is known:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723474
Anyway, including the diagnostic output in case it helps.
[...]
execl: /init: No such file or directory
febootstrap: debug: listing directory /
2 d . 040755 4096 88619:5000
2 d .. 040755 4096 88619:5000
11 d lost+found 040700 16384 0:0
12 d bin 040750 4096 23083:5000
13 d boot 040750 4096 23083:5000
14 d etc 040750 4096 23083:5000
109 d lib 040750 4096 23083:5000
156 d sbin 040750 4096 23083:5000
157 d usr 040750 4096 23083:5000
534 d var 040750 4096 23083:5000
690 - init 100750 3264 23083:5000
febootstrap: debug: listing directory /bin
12 d . 040750 4096 23083:5000
2 d .. 040755 4096 88619:5000
540 l rbash 120777 4 0:0 -> bash
541 l sh 120777 9 0:0 -> /bin/bash
febootstrap: debug: listing directory /lib
109 d . 040750 4096 23083:5000
2 d .. 040755 4096 88619:5000
110 d cryptsetup 040750 4096 23083:5000
113 d firmware 040750 4096 23083:5000
145 d init 040750 4096 23083:5000
146 d modules 040750 4096 23083:5000
147 d security 040750 4096 23083:5000
148 d udev 040750 4096 23083:5000
551 l libaio.so.1 120777 15 0:0 -> libaio.so.1.0.1
552 l libbsd.so.0 120777 15 0:0 -> libbsd.so.0.2.0
553 l libdbus-1.so.3 120777 18 0:0 -> libdbus-1.so.3.4.0
554 l libdrm_intel.so.1 120777 21 0:0 -> libdrm_intel.so.1.0.0
555 l libdrm_nouveau.so.1 120777 23 0:0 -> libdrm_nouveau.so.1.0.0
556 l libdrm_radeon.so.1 120777 22 0:0 -> libdrm_radeon.so.1.0.0
557 l libfuse.so.2 120777 16 0:0 -> libfuse.so.2.8.1
558 l libgcrypt.so.11 120777 19 0:0 -> libgcrypt.so.11.5.2
559 l libglib-2.0.so.0 120777 23 0:0 -> libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1
560 l libnih-dbus.so.1 120777 20 0:0 -> libnih-dbus.so.1.0.0
561 l libnih.so.1 120777 15 0:0 -> libnih.so.1.0.0
562 - libntfs-3g.so.75.0.0 100644 266616 0:0
563 l libntfs-3g.so.75 120777 20 0:0 -> libntfs-3g.so.75.0.0
564 l libparted.so.0 120777 18 0:0 -> libparted.so.0.0.1
565 l libpcre.so.3 120777 17 0:0 -> libpcre.so.3.12.1
566 l libply-boot-client.so.2 120777 27 0:0 -> libply-boot-client.so.2.0.0
567 l libply-splash-core.so.2 120777 27 0:0 -> libply-splash-core.so.2.0.0
568 l libply-splash-graphics.so.2 120777 31 0:0 ->
libply-splash-graphics.so.2.0.0
569 l libply.so.2 120777 15 0:0 -> libply.so.2.0.0
570 l libpng12.so.0 120777 18 0:0 -> libpng12.so.0.42.0
571 l libpopt.so.0 120777 16 0:0 -> libpopt.so.0.0.0
572 l libslang.so.2 120777 17 0:0 -> libslang.so.2.2.2
573 l libss.so.2 120777 12 0:0 -> libss.so.2.0
574 l libudev.so.0 120777 16 0:0 -> libudev.so.0.6.1
575 l libulockmgr.so.1 120777 20 0:0 -> libulockmgr.so.1.0.1
576 l libusb-0.1.so.4 120777 19 0:0 -> libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
febootstrap: debug: listing directory /lib64
The problem is that both /bin/bash and libc are completely missing
from the appliance.
During the build, was febootstrap able to download all the packages it
needed?
Which version of febootstrap are you using? (Generally speaking, you
should always try to use a recent version)
Do /bin/bash and /lib/libc.so.* appear in appliance/supermin.d/hostfiles?
Do the paths to the programs / libraries in hostfiles match up with
what is available on the host filesystem?
Have you installed (on the host) all the packages that are listed in
appliance/packagelist?
Is febootstrap downloading packages which match up with the packages
installed on the host? You'll have problems if your apt configuration
is significantly different from what is actually installed on your
host, eg. if 'unstable' packages are installed on the host, but the
unstable repo is disabled in sources.list.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora