Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 3/5] umount: add force umount and lazy umount
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:58:26PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 07/21/2012 08:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:15PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> Add the option force and lazy for force and lazy umount.
>
> What are these options used for? I think maybe they are useful for
> libguestfs live, but not for the libguestfs appliance case
> (mountpoints should never be busy in the appliance). Is libguestfs
> live what you're using them for?
>
mount_local and do something, and then I met busy umount.
That could be a different problem. The way to unmount
guestfs_mount_local is either: guestfs_umount_local or calling
'fusermount'.
http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#guestfs_umount_local
https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/a58368b3db4f02b9fd907cec826...
(Don't confuse mounts on the host with mounts in the appliance.)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora