On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:51:11PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> libguestfs (an LGPLv2+ library) uses the 'hash' module, which turns
> out to be "GPL".
>
> Actually this happened because we started to use it in a separate
> GPL'd utility program, but later on included this functionality in the
> core library, copying the same code from the utility but not checking
> the license of 'hash'.
>
> We'd therefore like to request that 'hash' is relicensed as LGPLv2+.
> If this is not possible, we will have to rewrite the code, probably
> implementing our own hash table, which would be a shame because hash
> works well for our needs.
>
> Notes:
>
> - the code doesn't appear to call exit (it does call abort), and so
> seems to be suitable for a library
>
> - hash-pjw which we also use is already licensed as LGPLv2+
>
> - it looks like the original author was Jim Meyering (CC'd)
>
> - the dependencies are all LGPLv2+
I'm going to write (or find) a new hash implementation for libguestfs
really soon. Is there any final chance this will be relicensed?
Hi Rich,
Sorry I didn't reply sooner. Somehow I missed this thread completely.
libguestfs is definitely a good argument for making hash LGPLv2.
I agree to relax its license to LGPLv2, and have just pushed this change: