Running sysprep is quite easy today because we use the export domain, which
is frequently NFS. So we simply mount it on the conversion host and run
sysprep against the disks of the converted VM before it is imported.
Soon, we want to skip the export domain, so the disks of the VM will be in
a separate domain. We can still find them and run the sysprep, but I have
the feeling that it would be more logical if virt-v2v did the sysprep when
target is oVirt / RHV.
On 27 February 2018 at 13:34, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:53:08PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 12:35:36 CET Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
> > Remove ties to MAC address because it is likely to change.
>
> v2v tries to preserve the MAC address of network interfaces; few months
> ago we did a fix regarding this:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506572
>
> The approach of this patch is IMHO not good, since it removes the MAC
> address from the network-scripts, but still the rest of v2v will try
> to preserve the MAC addresses.
We preserve the MAC address in metadata. On the other hand AIUI this
patch only removes the association in the ifcfg files and the guest
will reassociate it when it boots (albeit it might then mix up the
ethernet interfaces so that's not good).
There's IMHO a bigger problem which is not being addressed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922
> What's the reason behind this patch?
There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some
discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers
who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing
software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have
been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations
except for just a couple, including ‘net-hwaddr’, so the effect is
roughly the same as this patch.
The question was raised why they need to do that as a separate step
and why virt-v2v doesn't do it. And indeed there was some discussion
about whether or not converted guests need a new MAC address -- it's
at best unclear -- it is thought that VMware might reuse MAC addresses
which have "left" the hypervisor, although no one knows if that's
really true or not.
I don't have much opinion on this. Maybe it's best for CFME to
continue to run virt-sysprep as a separate step.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~
rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
http://libguestfs.org
--
*Fabien Dupont*
PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER
Red Hat - Solutions Engineering
fabien(a)redhat.com M: +33 (0) 662 784 971 <+33662784971>
<
http://redhat.com> *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.*
Twitter: @redhatway <
https://twitter.com/redhatway> | Instagram: @redhatinc
<
https://www.instagram.com/redhatinc/> | Snapchat: @redhatsnaps