6:41 a.m.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
[ CC to Rich ]
On 2012年04月17日 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
>On 2012年04月17日 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>On 2012年04月17日 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>>>The new copyright statements is:
>>>>>
>>>>><copyright>
>>>>>Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>>libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>>>>modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>>>>published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the
>>>>>License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>>
>>>>>This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>>>but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranties of
>>>>>TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>>>>>PURPOSE.
>>>>>
>>>>>You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>>>>>along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>>>Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
>>>>></copyright>
>>>>
>>>>I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere in libvirt
>>>>code uses
>>>>
>>>>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>>>* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>>* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
>>>>02111-1307 USA
>>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
>>>update the address in libvirt codes too?
>>
>>Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
>>completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
>>about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
>>multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
>>
>>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>License
>>* along with this program. If not, see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>;.
>>
>
>I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's better
>, per they moves from time to time, ;-)
>
@Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
They've moved again?!
We are currently using:
Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
address a little while back.
commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
Author: Matthew Booth <mbooth(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000
Update FSF address.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
6:45 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [test-API 2/3] Add the better copyright statements in scripts
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:41:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> [ CC to Rich ]
>
> On 2012年04月17日 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
> >On 2012年04月17日 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> >>>On 2012年04月17日 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> >>>>>The new copyright statements is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>><copyright>
> >>>>>Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute it
and/or
> >>>>>modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> >>>>>published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of
the
> >>>>>License, or (at your option) any later version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >>>>>but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranties
of
> >>>>>TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR
> >>>>>PURPOSE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
License
> >>>>>along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> >>>>>Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
> >>>>></copyright>
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere in
libvirt
> >>>>code uses
> >>>>
> >>>>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> >>>>* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free
Software
> >>>>* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
> >>>>02111-1307 USA
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
> >>>update the address in libvirt codes too?
> >>
> >>Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
> >>completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
> >>about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
> >>multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
> >>
> >>* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> >>License
> >>* along with this program. If not, see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>;.
> >>
> >
> >I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's better
> >, per they moves from time to time, ;-)
> >
>
> @Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
> from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
They've moved again?!
We are currently using:
Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
address a little while back.
commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
Author: Matthew Booth <mbooth(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000
Update FSF address.
Actually, I think it is libvirt that is at error here. The address i
posted above is wrong. This all just goes to show we shouldn't include
the street address at all, since no one can ever remember which one
is current :-)
/me will update libvirt to use the web address instead.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
7:37 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [test-API 2/3] Add the better copyright statements in scripts
On 2012年04月17日 19:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:22:48PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> [ CC to Rich ]
>
> On 2012年04月17日 19:18, Osier Yang wrote:
>> On 2012年04月17日 19:13, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 07:09:36PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>> On 2012年04月17日 19:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:59:24PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
>>>>>> The new copyright statements is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <copyright>
>>>>>> Copyright (C) 2010-2012 Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> libvirt-test-API is free software; you can redistribute it
and/or
>>>>>> modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>>>>> published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of
the
>>>>>> License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>>>> but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranties of
>>>>>> TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR
>>>>>> PURPOSE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
License
>>>>>> along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>>>>>> Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
>>>>>> </copyright>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm fairly sure that address is outdated - everywhere in libvirt
>>>>> code uses
>>>>>
>>>>> * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>>>> * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free
Software
>>>>> * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
>>>>> 02111-1307 USA
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reminding, will post a v2, then think we need to
>>>> update the address in libvirt codes too?
>>>
>>> Hmm, I wonder if we are better off just removing the address
>>> completely. There are no end of bug reports in Fedora reviews
>>> about outdated addresses and the FSF have moved locations
>>> multiple times. I see GNULIB now just writes:
>>>
>>> * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>> License
>>> * along with this program. If not, see<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>;.
>>>
>>
>> I found this when checking the GNU website mins ago. Yeah, it's better
>> , per they moves from time to time, ;-)
>>
>
> @Rich, I had to say: I copied the last 3 sentences (the address part)
> from libguestfs. Perhaps it needs the updating too.
They've moved again?!
We are currently using:
Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
and went through a big process of fixing every file to use this
address a little while back.
commit 04ea1375c55aa67df4e7fc61dbb534111767f3b6
Author: Matthew Booth<mbooth(a)redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 8 14:27:49 2011 +0000
Update FSF address.
Rich.
Ah, my libguestfs repo is *too* old, :-)
Osier
4567
days inactive
4567
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Osier Yang -
Richard W.M. Jones