Hi, Pino
-----Original Message-----
From: libguestfs-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:libguestfs-bounces@redhat.com] On
Behalf Of Pino Toscano
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:16 PM
To: libguestfs(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH v2 1/5] uuid: add support to change uuid of btrfs
partition
In data mercoledì 24 giugno 2015 15:54:03, Chen Hanxiao ha scritto:
> btrfs-progs v4.1 add support to change uuid of btrfs fs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> v2: put btrfs operation back to daemon/btrfs.c
> move tests to tests/btrfs
>
> daemon/btrfs.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> daemon/daemon.h | 1 +
> daemon/uuids.c | 9 +++++--
> tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl | 6 +++++
> 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c
> index 20e5e6b..b82c1b9 100644
> --- a/daemon/btrfs.c
> +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,44 @@ do_btrfs_device_delete (char *const *devices, const char
*fs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +
> +/* btrfstune command add two new options
> + * -U UUID change fsid to UUID
> + * -u change fsid, use a random one
> + * since v4.1
> + * We could check wheter 'btrfstune' support
> + * '-u' and '-U UUID' option by checking the output of
> + * 'btrfstune' command.
> + */
> +static int
> +test_btrftune_uuid_opt (void)
> +{
> + static int result = -1;
> + if (result != -1)
> + return result;
> +
> + CLEANUP_FREE char *err = NULL;
> +
> + int r = commandr (NULL, &err, str_btrfstune, NULL);
> +
> + if (r == -1) {
> + reply_with_error ("btrfstune: %s", err);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* FIXME currently btrfstune do not support '--help'.
> + * If got an invalid options, it will print its usage
> + * in stderr.
> + * We had to check it there.
> + */
> + if (strstr (err, "-U") == NULL || strstr (err, "-u") ==
NULL)
> + result = 0;
> + else
> + result = 1;
> +
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> int
> do_btrfs_set_seeding (const char *device, int svalue)
> {
> @@ -807,6 +845,28 @@ do_btrfs_set_seeding (const char *device, int svalue)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int
> +btrfstune_set_uuid (const char *device, const char *uuid)
Call it btrfs_set_uuid please, as the fact that it uses btrfstune is an
implementation detail of it.
> +{
> + CLEANUP_FREE char *err = NULL;
> + int r;
> + int has_uuid_opts = test_btrftune_uuid_opt ();
> +
> + if (has_uuid_opts == 0) {
Check for <= 0 here, to consider errors in test_btrftune_uuid_opt
on the safe side.
> + reply_with_error ("btrfstune do not support '-u'");
reply_with_error ("btrfs filesystems' UUID cannot be changed");
How about:
errcode = ENOTSUP;
reply_with_error_errno (errcode, " btrfs filesystems' UUID cannot be
changed");
Then we got the errno, and set_uuid could tell whether we support this feature.
Regards,
- Chen
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + r = commandr (NULL, &err, str_btrfstune, "-f", "-U",
uuid, device, NULL);
> +
> + if (r == -1) {
> + reply_with_error ("%s: %s", device, err);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Takes optional arguments, consult optargs_bitmask. */
> int
> do_btrfs_fsck (const char *device, int64_t superblock, int repair)
> diff --git a/daemon/daemon.h b/daemon/daemon.h
> index 136e9a9..ee0c96f 100644
> --- a/daemon/daemon.h
> +++ b/daemon/daemon.h
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ extern char *debug_bmap_device (const char *subcmd, size_t
argc, char *const *co
>
> /*-- in btrfs.c --*/
> extern char *btrfs_get_label (const char *device);
> +extern int btrfstune_set_uuid (const char *device, const char *uuid);
>
> /*-- in ntfs.c --*/
> extern char *ntfs_get_label (const char *device);
> diff --git a/daemon/uuids.c b/daemon/uuids.c
> index 06b33e9..f7791ab 100644
> --- a/daemon/uuids.c
> +++ b/daemon/uuids.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,12 @@ swapuuid (const char *device, const char *uuid)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int
> +btrfsuuid (const char *device, const char *uuid)
> +{
> + return btrfstune_set_uuid (device, uuid);
> +}
What is this wrapper for? Just call btrfs_set_uuid below.
> int
> do_set_uuid (const char *device, const char *uuid)
> {
> @@ -111,8 +117,7 @@ do_set_uuid (const char *device, const char *uuid)
> r = swapuuid (device, uuid);
>
> else if (STREQ (vfs_type, "btrfs")) {
> - reply_with_error ("btrfs filesystems' UUID cannot be changed");
> - r = -1;
> + r = btrfsuuid (device, uuid);
> }
Minor style note: curly brackets can be removed now.
> else {
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl b/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> index 2fe7c59..cd60990 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> @@ -47,5 +47,11 @@ my $label = $g->vfs_label ("/dev/sda1");
> die "unexpected label: expecting 'newlabel' but got
'$label'"
> unless $label eq "newlabel";
>
> +# Setting btrfs UUID
> +$g->set_uuid ("/dev/sda1",
"12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012");
> +my $uuid = $g->vfs_uuid ("/dev/sda1");
> +die "unexpected label: expecting 'newlabel' but got
'$uuid'"
> + unless $uuid eq "12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012";
> +
Ignoring the "newlabel" copy&paste error: this code has the same issue
as the old test added to the action tests in generator/actions.ml.
That is, if btrfs-tools < 4.1 is used, then the test will fail (instead
of being skipped).
Thinking further about it: it might be better to make set_uuid return
ENOTSUP for all the unsupported filesystems (including older
btrfs-tools case). This way, the perl snippet above could check, when
set_uuid fails, for the last_errno() and consider that a hard failure
if it was different than ENOTSUP. Something like (untested):
eval {
$g->set_uuid (...);
};
my $err = $g->last_errno ();
if ($err == 0) {
my $uuid = $g->vfs_uuid (...);
die ...
} elsif ($err != Errno::ENOTSUP()) {
die $@
}
--
Pino Toscano
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs