On 02/23/22 00:05, Eric Blake wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:35:03PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Previously the macros used __LINE__ which meant they created a unique
> name specific to the line on which the macro was expanded. This
> worked to a limited degree for cases like:
>
> #define FOO \
> ({ int NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(foo) = 42; \
> NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(foo) * 2 })
Missing a ; after '* 2'.
>
> since the “FOO” macro is usually expanded at one place so both uses of
> NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME expanded to the same unique name. It didn't work
> if FOO was used twice on the same line, eg:
>
> int i = FOO * FOO;
This didn't actually fail. The failure we saw was more subtle:
MIN (MIN (1, 2), 3)
compiled (the inner MIN() creates an _x evaluated in the context of
the initializer of the outer MIN's _x, which is not in scope until the
initializer completes), but:
MIN (1, MIN (2, 3))
failed to compile with -Werror -Wshadow, because now the inner MIN's
_x is declared inside the scope of the initializer of the outer MIN's
_y, when an outer _x is already in scope.
I wish we could suppress -Wshadow in macro definitions, but I think
"#pragma GCC diagnostics" may not work that way (or is not available on
all the necessary compilers) :/
for the series
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
Laszlo
>
> would fail, but this would work:
>
> int i = FOO *
> FOO;
Or, back to the example we actually hit,
MIN (1,
MIN (2, 3))
worked.
>
> Use __COUNTER__ instead of __LINE__, but NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME must now
> be used differently. The FOO macro above must be rewritten as:
>
> #define FOO FOO_1(NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(foo))
> #define FOO_1(foo) \
> ({ int foo = 42; \
> foo * 2 })
>
> Thanks: Eric Blake
> ---
> +++ b/common/include/test-checked-overflow.c
> @@ -39,29 +39,25 @@
>
> #define TEST_MUL(a, b, result, expected_overflow, expected_result) \
> do { \
> - bool NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(_actual_overflow); \
> + bool actual_overflow; \
> \
> - NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(_actual_overflow) = \
> - MUL_OVERFLOW_FALLBACK ((a), (b), (result)); \
> - assert (NBDKIT_UNIQUE_NAME(_actual_overflow) == (expected_overflow)); \
> + actual_overflow = MUL_OVERFLOW_FALLBACK ((a), (b), (result)); \
Extra spacing after =
The commit message may need touching up, but ACK to the change itself.