On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:34 PM Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 08/18/2018 03:09 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:58 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:44 PM Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> #ifdef FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE
>>>> - r = do_fallocate (h->fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, offset, count);
>>>> - if (r == -1 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP) {
>>>> - nbdkit_error ("zero: %m");
>>>> + if (h->can_zero_range) {
>>>> + r = do_fallocate (h->fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE, offset, count);
>>>> + if (r== 0)
>>>
>>> Spacing is off.
>>>
>>
> It does look off in my mail client (inbox), but looks fine (2 spaces
> indentation)
> in my editor.
Not the leading spaces, but the asymmetric space around '=='.
Thanks, got it finally :-)
(Yes,
Thunderbird is known to have a display bug where lines prefixed with
space show at a different indentation levels than lines prefixed with -
or +, which makes patch review via Thunderbird a bit more awkward than
it should be - but that's not what I was complaining about)
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 <(919)%20301-3266>
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org