On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:41:22PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
The other patch adjusts the test output of rhbz557655. xstrtol seems
to
be behaving differently here. I didn't investigate why yet.
There's a fix for this upstream now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567567
to make the testsuite pass.
---
regressions/rhbz557655-expected.stderr | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/regressions/rhbz557655-expected.stderr
b/regressions/rhbz557655-expected.stderr
index ea560e8..bc62baa 100644
--- a/regressions/rhbz557655-expected.stderr
+++ b/regressions/rhbz557655-expected.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-set-memsize: memsize: integer out of range
-set-memsize: memsize: integer out of range
-set-memsize: memsize: integer out of range
-set-memsize: memsize: integer out of range
+set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 1)
+set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 1)
+set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 1)
+set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 1)
set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 4)
set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 2)
set-memsize: memsize: invalid integer parameter (xstrtol returned 2)
which hopefully means you should be able to drop this patch
from Debian.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top