On 02/28/22 10:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:59:37AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/24/22 13:12, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/24/22 11:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 05:19:15PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>> Using the previously extracted function decrypt_mountables(), look for
>>>> LUKS devices on logical volumes (LVs) too.
>>>>
>>>> In the LVM-on-LUKS scheme, the names of the plaintext (decrypted) block
>>>> devices don't matter, as these devices host Physical Volumes, and
LVM
>>>> enumerates PVs automatically -- there are no references to these
decrypted
>>>> block devices in "/etc/fstab", for example. For naming such
decrypted
>>>> devices, continue calling make_mapname().
>>>>
>>>> In the LUKS-on-LVM scheme however, the decrypted devices are supposed to
>>>> hold filesystems, and "/etc/fstab" may refer to them. Such
decrypted
>>>> devices are commonly called /dev/mapper/luks-<UUID>, where
<UUID> is the
>>>> UUID inside the LUKS header. Employ this naming when decrypting Logical
>>>> Volumes. Reuse make_mapname() as a fallback in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658126
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658126
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> options/decrypt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/options/decrypt.c b/options/decrypt.c
>>>> index 9141cf5193ad..f7c1d876b3ed 100644
>>>> --- a/options/decrypt.c
>>>> +++ b/options/decrypt.c
>>>> @@ -38,8 +38,11 @@
>>>> #include "options.h"
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> - * Make a LUKS map name from the partition name,
>>>> - * eg. C<"/dev/vda2" =E<gt>
"cryptvda2">
>>>> + * Make a LUKS map name from the partition or logical volume name, eg.
>>>> + * C<"/dev/vda2" =E<gt> "cryptvda2">, or
C<"/dev/vg-ssd/lv-root7" =E<gt>
>>>> + * "cryptvgssdlvroot7">. Note that, in logical volume
device names,
>>>> + * c_isalnum() eliminates the "/" separator from between the
VG and the LV, so
>>>> + * this mapping is not unique; but for our purposes, it will do.
>>>> */
>>>> static void
>>>> make_mapname (const char *device, char *mapname, size_t len)
>>>> @@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ make_mapname (const char *device, char *mapname, size_t
len)
>>>>
>>>> static bool
>>>> decrypt_mountables (guestfs_h *g, const char * const *mountables,
>>>> - struct key_store *ks)
>>>> + struct key_store *ks, bool name_decrypted_by_uuid)
>>>> {
>>>> bool decrypted_some = false;
>>>> const char * const *mnt_scan = mountables;
>>>> @@ -77,7 +80,7 @@ decrypt_mountables (guestfs_h *g, const char * const
*mountables,
>>>> CLEANUP_FREE char *type = NULL;
>>>> CLEANUP_FREE char *uuid = NULL;
>>>> CLEANUP_FREE_STRING_LIST char **keys = NULL;
>>>> - char mapname[32];
>>>> + char mapname[512];
>>>> const char * const *key_scan;
>>>> const char *key;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -102,7 +105,9 @@ decrypt_mountables (guestfs_h *g, const char * const
*mountables,
>>>> assert (keys[0] != NULL);
>>>>
>>>> /* Generate a node name for the plaintext (decrypted) device node.
*/
>>>> - make_mapname (mountable, mapname, sizeof mapname);
>>>> + if (!name_decrypted_by_uuid || uuid == NULL ||
>>>> + snprintf (mapname, sizeof mapname, "luks-%s", uuid)
< 0)
>>>> + make_mapname (mountable, mapname, sizeof mapname);
>>>
>>> This should all really be using asprintf, and not stack-allocating
>>> large arrays. Although it's kind of not related to this change, this
>>> change does make the stack frame larger.
>>
>> asprintf() was my first idea, but reworking make_mapname() would then
>> require measuring the input string lenght ;)
>>
>> OK, I'll insert a patch between #1 and #2 for converting make_mapname()
>> to asprintf(), then I'll redo this patch with asprintf() too.
>
> On a second thought, if it's OK with you:
>
> I'd prefer merging this series as-is, and then posting additional
> patches on top:
>
> - assume GUESTFS_HAVE_LUKS_UUID
> - assume GUESTFS_HAVE_CRYPTSETUP_OPEN
> - bump libguestfs version requirement in
> virt-v2v.git/m4/guestfs-libraries.m4 to 1.44
> - remove "XXX Should we set GUESTFS_CRYPTSETUP_OPEN_READONLY"
> - allocate "mapname" with asprintf() on all paths.
>
> The reason I'd like to do these afterwards is that none of these warts
> are introduced/created by this series, and I had put lots of testing
> into the series (not just at the end, but mid-series too). If I rebased
> and needed to resolved conflicts, all that testing would have to be
> redone. I'd really like to avoid that.
That's fine.
Thanks!
Commit range 41126802097f..2d8c0f8d40b5 (for now).
Thanks,
Laszlo