On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:02:22PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
GCC 9 gives this error which I believe is bogus:
It turns out it's not bogus (sort of). C99 says the minimum length of
strings supported by %s has to be at least 4095:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8119914/printf-fprintf-maximum-size-a...
Of course that's in some extreme minimal case and I hope it doesn't
apply to our actual glibc printf. It would be nice if the limit could
reflect what glibc can do.
I think turned down or off the warning is still the right thing here,
but the commit message could be better.
Rich.
qemuopts.c: In function 'qemuopts_to_config_channel':
qemuopts.c:987:29: error: '%.*s' directive output between 0 and 2147483647 bytes
may exceed minimum required size of 4095 [-Werror=format-overflow=]
987 | fprintf (fp, " %.*s = ", (int) k, values[j]);
| ^~~~
qemuopts.c:987:26: note: assuming directive output of 1 byte
987 | fprintf (fp, " %.*s = ", (int) k, values[j]);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
---
m4/guestfs-c.m4 | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/m4/guestfs-c.m4 b/m4/guestfs-c.m4
index 3fd44ed6b..e20721f5f 100644
--- a/m4/guestfs-c.m4
+++ b/m4/guestfs-c.m4
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ gl_WARN_ADD([-Wimplicit-fallthrough=4])
dnl GCC level 2 gives incorrect warnings, so use level 1.
gl_WARN_ADD([-Wformat-truncation=1])
+dnl GCC 9 at level 2 gives apparently bogus errors when %.*s is used.
+gl_WARN_ADD([-Wformat-overflow=1])
+
AC_SUBST([WARN_CFLAGS])
NO_SNV_CFLAGS=
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top