Re: [Libguestfs] another GTK3 regression...

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:56:40PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 09/30/22 11:46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 10:33:02AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> Hmm, here's an interesting stackoverflow posting ... > >> > >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3301023/gtk-spinner-not-appearing > >> > >> The first point is "Make sure librsvg is installed". librsvg is _not_ > >> installed in the ISO. Laszlo, can you try building an ISO with this > >> package explicitly added to the deps? > > > > Yes, that could be it. The widget is rendered using CSS and the > > Adwaita CSS rule references "process-working-symbolic" as the > > icon, and that icon is only shipped in SVG format AFAICT. > > (1) sorry, I've been in write-only mode for a long while now. That's why > we've apparently arrived at nearly the same conclusions thus far, > duplicating (triplicating?) our efforts. That said, I'm glad we did > arrive at the same ideas. > > (2) A number of surprises: > > (2a) p2v already spells out icewm[-lite] as a depencency, just not when > the VM boot disk image / ISO image is based on Fedora (more precisely: > for SUSE). When building on Fedora, the WM included is Metacity instead > (and the launch script starts metacity vs. icewm accordingly.) It seems like SUSE developer Cédric Bosdonnat made that addition. He actually removed metacity and replaced it with icewm-lite (commit cebcf47f6) and then made the change to the launch script to select the right WM (commit 75c24c710). However he didn't make any corresponding change to Fedora so we now have both. icewm is available in RHEL 9. I don't know if there's any reason to prefer metacity over icewm. Usually when looking at virt-p2v dependencies, we tended to prefer, in order: