On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:23:57AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 09:51:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>nbdkit uses about 1.1G of storage for artifacts. I have personally
>never looked at anything other than the artifacts of the latest failed
>job, so I don't believe we need to keep these around for long. This
>commit proposes expiring (and thus deleting) artifacts after 1 week.
>
>https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/usage_quotas
>
>If accepted I will make a similar change for libnbd.
>
>Martin, Dan - I don't know a lot about this and I know you've looked
>into this area a lot more. What do you think of this change?
>
It definitely makes sense, similar setting is in libvirt repos, the
artifacts expire after 1 day. Long time ago I was under the
impression that the default is not to keep them around (bearing in
mind that the latest artifact is always kept until a new pipeline
runs). Now I know this applies only for successful jobs and can be
turned off in settings. I think you can safely set that to any low
value and all should be fine.
Thanks Martin, pushed for nbdkit here:
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/4d795c422baffed72e862f6eba24d9f...
I want to check the nbdkit pipeline still works before I make
changes in the other projects.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html