On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 03:55:15PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:16:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 02:10:01PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
[...]
>>> I haven't find any unit tests for these kind of functions, so no
>>> tests are added. If there is a place where tests would fit
>>> nicely, feel free to let me know.
>>
>>... I think the tests might actually be broken by this patch. Did you
>>try: ‘make -C test-data check && make -C v2v check’?
>>
>
>good point, probably not after the patch. will do.
>
The tests pass. Should I add/change something in there as well since I'm going
to be sending v2 anyway?
My bad, I had the appliance and daemon disabled. I'll build with that and
update the patch accordingly, sorry for the noise.
[...]
>>> But I just noticed I forgot to differentiate SLED from SLES. It
>>> should be possible based on i_product_name. I think it would make
>>> sense for libosinfo and it doesn't look like they are separate in
>>> libguestfs (on purpose). Would it also make sense to separate them
>>> here? Is it even possible? I'm not sure what the compatibility
>>> promises are.
>>
>>No idea. We just try to provide libvirt XML which is as useful as
>>possible.
>>
I added SLED/SLES differentiation to v2.