Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH v3] spec: Clarify BLOCK_STATUS reply details

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 04:08:07PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > Our docs were inconsistent on whether a NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS > reply chunk can exceed the client's requested length, and silent on > whether the lengths must be consistent when multiple contexts were > negotiated. Clarify this to match existing practice as implemented in > qemu-nbd. Clean up some nearby grammatical errors while at it. > --- > > Another round of rewording attempts, based on feedback from Rich on > v2. I went ahead and pushed patch 1 and 2 of the v2 series, as they > were less controversial. > This seems clearer now, thanks. Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt;