On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:30:21PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 08/18/22 11:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This is upstream in 5 commits 5764fa6f4..dd28b0054:
>
>
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/2620d95a4585204f0db0d55c0d41276...
>
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/185e7d4010b353f36b5ca5d47467a77...
>
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/17655b1ca67caa454e7a4ac83bc8c05...
>
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/e7fdffde8142fb083625678b7a55455...
>
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/commit/dd28b005430d020ccd1825437937c31...
>
> This also includes dirfd functionality and a rather complicated test
> for that. Turns out that bash refuses to open a directory as a file
> descriptor :-(
This doesn't match my experience; for me, bash opens e.g. /tmp just fine
on both RHEL7 and Fedora35 -- but it must be a read-only open.
$ exec 9</tmp
[ok]
Hmmm, that makes sense since we don't even need to write to the
directory. Let's see if I can simplify that test ...
$ exec 9<>/tmp
bash: /tmp: Is a directory
The latter is actually expected; it comes from open(). See EISDIR at
<
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html>.
Commit dd28b005430d also adds
dfd = open (tmpdir, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY);
where I think O_DIRECTORY is not strictly necessary (per spec, because
O_CREAT is absent, O_DIRECTORY only helps us refuse a non-directory --
but we do not expect such "attacks" here). So my take is that
O_DIRECTORY could be dropped from the C code, at which point a bash
redirection (read-only) should work just the same.
Laszlo
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
http://libguestfs.org