On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:34:33 +0200
Pino Toscano <ptoscano(a)redhat.com> wrote:
When writing the OVF in OVirt flavour, add a ovirt:id attribute to
the
OperatingSystemSection tag: this attribute represents the numeric value
of the ostype ID, which is ignored by oVirt when parsing OVFs in API
mode.
---
v2v/create_ovf.ml | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 201 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/v2v/create_ovf.ml b/v2v/create_ovf.ml
index 64edd2b86..f56c4cb64 100644
--- a/v2v/create_ovf.ml
+++ b/v2v/create_ovf.ml
@@ -216,6 +216,203 @@ and get_ostype = function
typ distro major minor arch product;
"Unassigned"
+(* Determine the ovirt:id attribute from libguestfs inspection.
+ * See ovirt-engine sources, file:
+ * packaging/conf/osinfo-defaults.properties
+ * and also:
+ *
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219857#c9
+ *)
+and get_ovirt_osid = function
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 3;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 9
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 3;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 15
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 4;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 8
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 4;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 14
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 5;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 7
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 5;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 13
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 6;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 18
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 6;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 19
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 6;
+ i_minor_version = min; i_arch = ("ppc64"|"ppc64le") } when min
>= 9 ->
+ 1007
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 6;
+ i_arch = ("ppc64"|"ppc64le") } ->
+ 1003
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 7;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 24
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 7;
+ i_arch = ("ppc64"|"ppc64le") } ->
+ 1006
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = ("rhel"|"centos");
i_major_version = 7;
+ i_arch = "s390x" } ->
+ 2003
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "sles"; i_major_version = 11;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 1193
Shouldn't we here and for the one below use: i_major_version >= 11?
There's also SLES 12.
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "sles"; i_major_version = 11;
+ i_arch = "ppc64" | "ppc64le" } ->
+ 1004
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "sles"; i_major_version = 12;
+ i_arch = "s390x" } ->
+ 2004
+
+ (* Only Debian 7 is available, so use it for any 7+ version. *)
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "debian"; i_major_version = v }
+ when v >= 7 ->
+ 1300
+
+ (* Only Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04 are available, so use them starting
+ * from 12.04, and 14.04 for anything after it.
+ *)
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = v;
+ i_arch = ("ppc64"|"ppc64le") } when v >= 14 ->
+ 1005
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = v;
+ i_arch = "s390x" } when v >= 16 ->
+ 2005
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = v }
+ when v >= 14 ->
+ 1256
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = 12;
+ i_minor_version = 4 } ->
+ 1252
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = 12;
+ i_minor_version = 10 } ->
+ 1253
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = 13;
+ i_minor_version = 4 } ->
+ 1254
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_distro = "ubuntu"; i_major_version = 13;
+ i_minor_version = 10 } ->
+ 1255
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_arch = ("ppc64"|"ppc64le") }
->
+ 1002
+
+ | { i_type = "linux"; i_arch = "s390x" } ->
+ 2002
+
+ | { i_type = "linux" } ->
+ 5
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 5; i_minor_version = 1 } ->
+ 1 (* no architecture differentiation of XP on RHV *)
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 5; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_product_name = product } when String.find product "XP" >= 0 ->
+ 1 (* no architecture differentiation of XP on RHV *)
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 5; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 3
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 5; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 10
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 0;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 4
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 0;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 16
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 1;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 11
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 1;
+ i_arch = "x86_64"; i_product_variant = "Client" } ->
+ 12
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 1;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 17
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 20
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_arch = "x86_64"; i_product_variant = "Client" } ->
+ 21
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 2;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 23
+
+ (* Treat Windows 8.1 client like Windows 8. See:
+ *
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309580#c4
+ *)
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 3;
+ i_arch = "i386"; i_product_variant = "Client" } ->
+ 20
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 3;
+ i_arch = "x86_64"; i_product_variant = "Client" } ->
+ 21
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 6; i_minor_version = 3;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 23
This one is Windows Server 2012R2 and should map to 25.
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 10; i_minor_version = 0;
+ i_arch = "i386" } ->
+ 26
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 10; i_minor_version = 0;
+ i_arch = "x86_64"; i_product_variant = "Client" } ->
+ 27
+
+ | { i_type = "windows"; i_major_version = 10; i_minor_version = 0;
+ i_arch = "x86_64" } ->
+ 29
+
+ | { i_type = typ; i_distro = distro;
+ i_major_version = major; i_minor_version = minor; i_arch = arch;
+ i_product_name = product } ->
+ warning (f_"unknown guest operating system: %s %s %d.%d %s (%s)")
+ typ distro major minor arch product;
+ 0
+
There are also 1001 which is unspecified PPC and 2001 which is unspecified
s390x. Maybe we want to use those too?
(* Set the <Origin/> element based on the source hypervisor.
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342398#c6
*
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/59147/
@@ -295,6 +492,7 @@ let rec create_ovf source targets guestcaps inspect
"xmlns:vssd",
"http://schemas.dmtf.org/wbem/wscim/1/cim-schema/2/CIM_VirtualSystemSettingData";
"xmlns:xsi", "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
"xmlns:ovf", "http://schemas.dmtf.org/ovf/envelope/1/";
+ "xmlns:ovirt", "http://www.ovirt.org/ovf";
"ovf:version", "0.9"
] [
Comment generated_by;
@@ -357,8 +555,10 @@ let rec create_ovf source targets guestcaps inspect
] in
(match ovf_flavour with
| OVirt ->
+ let ovirt_osid = get_ovirt_osid inspect in
e "OperatingSystemSection" ["ovf:id", vm_uuid;
Having UUID here does not make sense. We can use 0 which is "Unknown" or
1 wich is "Other".
Tomas
- "ovf:required",
"false"]
+ "ovf:required", "false";
+ "ovirt:id", string_of_int ovirt_osid]
osinfo_subnodes
| RHVExportStorageDomain ->
e "Section" ["ovf:id", vm_uuid; "ovf:required",
"false";
--
2.14.3
--
Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi(a)redhat.com>