On 05/04/16 20:33, Pino Toscano wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2016 18:47:32 Matteo Cafasso wrote:
> The tests check that the filesystem_walk command is able to retrieve
> information regarding both existing and deleted files.
>
> A NTFS image is used as Ext3+ filesystems deletion is more aggressive
> in terms of metadata removal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <noxdafox(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> tests/tsk/Makefile.am | 3 +-
> tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100755 tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
>
> diff --git a/tests/tsk/Makefile.am b/tests/tsk/Makefile.am
> index 0cd7c03..f9b2fef 100644
> --- a/tests/tsk/Makefile.am
> +++ b/tests/tsk/Makefile.am
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
> include $(top_srcdir)/subdir-rules.mk
>
> TESTS = \
> - test-download-inode.sh
> + test-download-inode.sh \
> + test-filesystem-walk.sh
>
> TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = $(top_builddir)/run --test
>
> diff --git a/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..ab7c1a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/tsk/test-filesystem-walk.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +#!/bin/bash -
> +# libguestfs
> +# Copyright (C) 2016 Red Hat Inc.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> +# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> +
> +# Test the filesystem-walk command.
> +
> +if [ -n "$SKIP_TEST_FILESYSTEM_WALK_SH" ]; then
> + echo "$0: test skipped because environment variable is set."
> + exit 77
> +fi
> +
> +# Skip if TSK is not supported by the appliance.
> +if ! guestfish add /dev/null : run : available "libtsk"; then
> + echo "$0: skipped because TSK is not available in the appliance"
> + exit 77
> +fi
> +
> +if [ ! -s ../../test-data/phony-guests/windows.img ]; then
> + echo "$0: skipped because windows.img is zero-sized"
> + exit 77
> +fi
> +
> +# create and delete a file then list the filesystem content
> +output=$(guestfish --ro -a ../../test-data/phony-guests/windows.img \
> + run : \
> + mount /dev/sda2 / : \
> + write /test.txt "foobar" : \
> + rm /test.txt : \
> + umount / : \
> + filesystem-walk /dev/sda2)
This is a bit unreadable, a better approach is to read commands from
stdin; see for example fish/test-copy.sh.
> +
> +# test $MFT is in the list
> +echo $output | grep -q "{ tsk_inode: 0 tsk_type: r tsk_size: .* tsk_name: \$MFT
tsk_allocated: 1 }"
Hmm are you sure this works when tracing is disabled? The default
output in guestfish for structs is each field in a single line.
I tried it without tracing and it works as well. Just to be sure, I'll
add the -z flag to grep to ignore newlines.
Unless you compare the whole output like other tests do, a better
solution could be write this test using a scripting language like Perl:
I think most, if not all, of the non-bash tests are Perl-based, and it
would allow to do better checks for the return values.
I'm not familiar with
Perl therefore it would require a bit more of time
for little value.
I could do it in Python but I believe bash for such simple cases is way
more readable and effective.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs