Hi
在 2015年06月18日 18:53, Pino Toscano 写道:
On Thursday 18 June 2015 18:33:59 Cao jin wrote:
> Hi, Pino
>
> 在 2015年06月18日 16:41, Pino Toscano 写道:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 18 June 2015 11:01:37 Cao jin wrote:
>>>> Speaking of this: you said that you have a colleague working on
>>>> btrfs-progs? What about suggesting to create some machine-parseable
>>>> output (csv, xml, yaml, json, whatever) so extracting the results of
>>>> btrfs tools is a lot more easy?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I forward your suggestion and consult him, the result is not
>>> surprised:( Here is what I learned from him:
>>> For the btrfs-progs cmds who output strings, the output are plain,
>>> don`t have patterns. Seen some guys who want a formatted output, they do
>>> a filter by themself, it not reasonable to ask btrfs-progs to output
>>> formatted strings.
>>
>> This is exactly the issue here: every btrfs command has a totally
>> different formatting for its output. Just let him take a look at all
>> the commands implemented so far in libguestfs, you can easily spot
>> that:
>> - btrfs subvolume list
>> - btrfs subvolume show
>> - btrfs qgroup show
>> - btrfs balance status
>> - btrfs scrub status
>> - btrfs device stats
>> all have different custom parsers for each of their outputs.
>>
>> Compare that to e.g. the -m parameter for parted, so it outputs fields
>> separated by semi-colon.
>>
>
> Already forward your mail to my colleague. He think your comment is
> interesting, and also forward your option to btrfs-progs mail-list.
Great to hear that, thanks for it.
> Speaking of btrfs device stats output, what do you suggest to do for
> now? Since it may has multi devices.
I see few options:
(a) keep the current RHashTable
(b) turn the statistics into a proper struct, and use RStructList
(c) implement RHashTableList, and use it
(d) something else I'm missing
OK, I prefer (a), its implementation seems easier and more clear than
others. I will prepare a new patch, with commit message improved as you said
--
Yours Sincerely,
Cao Jin