On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
In data martedì 6 gennaio 2015 09:30:19, Hu Tao ha scritto:
> > > diff --git a/generator/actions.ml b/generator/actions.ml
> > > index c328319..5223eb8 100644
> > > --- a/generator/actions.ml
> > > +++ b/generator/actions.ml
> > > @@ -12281,6 +12281,21 @@ corrupt data." };
> > > longdesc = "\
> > > Check or repair a btrfs filesystem offline." };
> > >
> > > + { defaults with
> > > + name = "btrfs_filesystem_get_label";
> > > + style = RString "label", [Pathname "path"], [];
> > > + proc_nr = Some 437;
> > > + optional = Some "btrfs"; camel_name =
"BTRFSFilesystemGetLabel";
> > > + tests = [
> > > + InitPartition, Always, TestResultString (
> > > + [["mkfs_btrfs"; "/dev/sda1"; "";
""; "NOARG"; ""; "label"; "NOARG";
""; ""];
> > > + ["mount"; "/dev/sda1"; "/"];
> > > + ["btrfs_filesystem_get_label"; "/";]],
"label\n"), [];
> > > + ];
> >
> > This test bit would be good to be added to the tests of vfs_label,
> > just with s/Always/IfAvailable "btrfs"/ so it is run only when btrfs
> > is available.
Feel free to send this bit (updated) anyway, also for patch 5.
Yeah, I'm planning to update the bit for all btrfs-related patches.
Thank you for reminding!
Regards,
Hu