On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:23:29AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
 In data martedì 6 gennaio 2015 09:30:19, Hu Tao ha scritto:
 > > > diff --git a/generator/actions.ml b/generator/actions.ml
 > > > index c328319..5223eb8 100644
 > > > --- a/generator/actions.ml
 > > > +++ b/generator/actions.ml
 > > > @@ -12281,6 +12281,21 @@ corrupt data." };
 > > >      longdesc = "\
 > > >  Check or repair a btrfs filesystem offline." };
 > > >  
 > > > +  { defaults with
 > > > +    name = "btrfs_filesystem_get_label";
 > > > +    style = RString "label", [Pathname "path"], [];
 > > > +    proc_nr = Some 437;
 > > > +    optional = Some "btrfs"; camel_name =
"BTRFSFilesystemGetLabel";
 > > > +    tests = [
 > > > +      InitPartition, Always, TestResultString (
 > > > +        [["mkfs_btrfs"; "/dev/sda1"; "";
""; "NOARG"; ""; "label"; "NOARG";
""; ""];
 > > > +         ["mount"; "/dev/sda1"; "/"];
 > > > +         ["btrfs_filesystem_get_label"; "/";]],
"label\n"), [];
 > > > +    ];
 > > 
 > > This test bit would be good to be added to the tests of vfs_label,
 > > just with s/Always/IfAvailable "btrfs"/ so it is run only when btrfs
 > > is available.
 
 Feel free to send this bit (updated) anyway, also for patch 5. 
Yeah, I'm planning to update the bit for all btrfs-related patches.
Thank you for reminding!
Regards,
Hu