On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:45:15PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 10/31/23 14:17, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> On some older Debian-based distros (in particular, this is true for
> Debian 8) GRUB config file doesn't reside on EFI partition, but rather
> at /boot/grub/grub.cfg even if UEFI firmware is being used. As a
> result, in the UEFI case we get "error: no bootloader detected".
Let's
> just append this path to the end of the corresponding list as a workaround
> when dealing with UEFI guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev <andrey.drobyshev(a)virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> mldrivers/linux_bootloaders.ml | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mldrivers/linux_bootloaders.ml b/mldrivers/linux_bootloaders.ml
> index 6f8857e..91c5ab9 100644
> --- a/mldrivers/linux_bootloaders.ml
> +++ b/mldrivers/linux_bootloaders.ml
> @@ -375,6 +375,18 @@ let detect_bootloader (g : G.guestfs) root i_firmware =
> with G.Error msg ->
> error (f_"could not find bootloader mount point (%s): %s") mp msg
in
>
> + (*
> + * Workaround for older UEFI-based Debian which may not have
> + * /boot/efi/EFI/debian/grub.cfg.
> + *)
> + let paths =
> + if g#exists "/boot/grub/grub.cfg" then
> + match i_firmware with
> + | Firmware.I_BIOS -> paths
> + | I_UEFI _ -> paths @ ["/boot/grub/grub.cfg"]
> + else paths
> + in
> +
> (* We can determine if the bootloader config file is grub 1 or
> * grub 2 just by looking at the filename.
> *)
I'm not sure if the g#exists check is helpful; after all, in the "loop"
function, we have a stricter g#is_file check. IOW, if the special path
does not exist (or does not resolve to a regular file, after following
symlinks), then "loop" will drop the candidate anyway. And if g#exists
returns true, then "loop" may still drop the candidate (or may keep it).
So IMO, just the inner "match" would suffice.
Anyway, I don't want to draw this out forever, so with the g#exists
check kept, or removed:
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
Andrey, if we push this patch (to libguestfs-common) then we no longer
need the other patch as the i_firmware parameter is still required, is
that correct? I can push this once confirmed.
BTW I apologise for the mailing list problems. We are in the process
of moving the server, and the mailing address is now
'guestfs(a)lists.libguestfs.org' with archives at
https://lists.libguestfs.org . I haven't made the announcement yet.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit