On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 4:24 PM Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 07:14:32AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
 >On 5/6/21 6:30 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
 >> At some point GCC added some optimisations and checks that started emitting
 >> warnings on harmless code:
 >>
 >>   ...dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules...
 >>
 >> This was later fixed, but can still break the build (or report warnings) on old
 >> GCCs (e.g. 7.5.0) when building the libev example.
 >>
 >> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
 >> ---
 >>  configure.ac | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 >>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
 >>
 >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
 >> index 19b7bfdb5d2a..3b51354346cc 100644
 >> --- a/configure.ac
 >> +++ b/configure.ac
 >> @@ -247,6 +247,30 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBEV], [libev], [
 >>          AC_MSG_WARN([ev.h not found, some examples will not be compiled])
 >>      ])
 >>  ])
 >> +
 >> +AS_IF([test "x$LIBEV_LIBS" != "x"], [
 >> +    old_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
 >> +    CFLAGS="-Werror=strict-aliasing -O2"
 >> +    AC_MSG_CHECKING([if the compiler is new enough for good aliasing rules])
 >> +    AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([
 >> +        AC_LANG_PROGRAM([
 >> +            #include <ev.h>
 >> +
 >> +            static void cb (struct ev_loop *l, ev_timer *t, int e) { }
 >> +            static ev_timer timer;
 >> +        ], [
 >> +            ev_timer_init (&timer, cb, 0, .1);
 >> +        ])
 >> +    ], [
 >> +        AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
 >> +    ], [
 >> +        AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
 >> +        AC_SUBST([LIBEV_CFLAGS], [""])
 >> +        AC_SUBST([LIBEV_LIBS], [""])
 >> +        AC_MSG_WARN([compiler is probably too old to compile with libev without
errors, some examples will not be compiled])
 >
 >Do we really need to skip compiling the example altogether, or can we
 >just modify CFLAGS to add -Wno-strict-aliasing to prevent the failure?
 >
 This is one of the results that I was not sure about.  We could just add
 no-strict-aliasing for that one particular example of course.  I figured
 it is just an example and it only causes an issue on CentOS 7, OpenSUSE
 Leap 15.2, Ubuntu 18.04 and some similarly old systems if I remember
 correctly. 
Do we really support Centos 7? libnbd is available since rhel 8 (2, 3?).
Why support older systems?
Time spent on older systems means less time working features,
performance, support for new systems, etc.
 But changing the LIBEV_CFLAGS seems more fit for the purpose. 
Sounds like the best option.
Nir