Re: [Libguestfs] New Rust bindings for nbdkit

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and > they > > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten them. The new > bindings > > > aren't backwards compatible, but I doubt that's a problem. Most > likely, > > > nobody has tried to use them yet, since the crate hasn't even > published to > > > crates.io. Please review the attached patch. > > > -Alan > > > Other issues: > > > > * The license removed this clause: > > > > -// * Neither the name of Red Hat nor the names of its contributors > may be > > -// used to endorse or promote products derived from this software > without > > -// specific prior written permission. > > > > I believe this removal simply makes the license even more > > permissive, so that's fine. However I will check with our legal > > people. Also you should add license headers to the new files > > plugins/rust/tests/*.rs. Essentially every file should have a > > license, and correct licensing is very important to us. > > This change is replacing 3-clause BSD with 2-clause BSD. Shouldn't cuase > any actual difference for consumers, but seems like a needless change to > be making. > > Regards, > Daniel > My reasoning was that the 2-clause license is preferred for new code (at least in every other community where I've active), and this plugin is new code. But I can add the 3rd clause back if libguestfs likes it.