In data lunedì 29 giugno 2015 02:36:57, Chen, Hanxiao ha scritto:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: libguestfs-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:libguestfs-bounces@redhat.com] On
> Behalf Of Pino Toscano
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:12 PM
> To: libguestfs(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH v3.1 1/9] uuid: add support to change uuid of
btrfs
> partition
>
> In data venerdì 26 giugno 2015 17:35:36, Chen Hanxiao ha scritto:
> > btrfs-progs v4.1 add support to change uuid of btrfs fs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > v3.1: fix a typo
> > v3: set errno as ENOTSUP when btrfstune -u is not available
> > v2: put btrfs operation back to daemon/btrfs.c
> > move tests to tests/btrfs
> >
> > daemon/btrfs.c | 60
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > daemon/daemon.h | 1 +
> > daemon/uuids.c | 6 ++---
> > tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl | 17 ++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c
> > index 20e5e6b..a69c512 100644
> > --- a/daemon/btrfs.c
> > +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c
> > @@ -790,6 +790,44 @@ do_btrfs_device_delete (char *const *devices, const char
> *fs)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +/* btrfstune command add two new options
> > + * -U UUID change fsid to UUID
> > + * -u change fsid, use a random one
> > + * since v4.1
> > + * We could check wheter 'btrfstune' support
> > + * '-u' and '-U UUID' option by checking the output of
> > + * 'btrfstune' command.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +test_btrfstune_uuid_opt (void)
> > +{
> > + static int result = -1;
> > + if (result != -1)
> > + return result;
> > +
> > + CLEANUP_FREE char *err = NULL;
> > +
> > + int r = commandr (NULL, &err, str_btrfstune, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (r == -1) {
> > + reply_with_error ("btrfstune: %s", err);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* FIXME currently btrfstune do not support '--help'.
>
> So --help should be passed anyway to the btrfstune invocation, so with
> newer versions hopefully there will not be complaints about it anymore.
Fine.
>
[snip]
> > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl b/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> > index 2fe7c59..b47caab 100755
> > --- a/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> > +++ b/tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-misc.pl
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >
> > use strict;
> > use warnings;
> > +use Errno;
> >
> > use Sys::Guestfs;
> >
> > @@ -47,5 +48,21 @@ my $label = $g->vfs_label ("/dev/sda1");
> > die "unexpected label: expecting 'newlabel' but got
'$label'"
> > unless $label eq "newlabel";
> >
> > +# Setting btrfs UUID
> > +eval {
> > + $g->set_uuid ("/dev/sda1",
"12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012");
> > +};
> > +# FIXME: ignore ESRCH
>
> What is ESRCH about?
The problem is every time I got a ESRCH here.
I have no idea about this.
Can we just ignore it by:
} elsif ($err == Errno::ESRCH()) {
;
} else {
die $@;
}
No, please investigate why you are getting such errno.
One guess is that a leftover from a failing operation, and that
set_uuid actually succeeded. In that case, checking first for $@ might
do the trick:
eval {
...
}
if ($@) {
# failed, check last_errno
} else {
# good, compare with vfs_uuid
}
> > +my $err = $g->last_errno ();
> > +
> > +if ($err == 0) {
> > + my $uuid = $g->vfs_uuid ("/dev/sda1");
> > + die "unexpected uuid expecting
> > + '12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012' but got
'$uuid'"
> > + unless $uuid eq "12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012";
> > +} elsif ($err == Errno::ENOTSUP()) {
> > + warn "$0: skipping test for btrfs UUID change feature is not
available\n";
> > +}
>
> IIRC 'warn' prints the newline at the end already.
>
> This is missing to check when $err is a valid error.
>
Can we just:
} else {
die $@;
}
Yes, that should be fine.
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano