On Tuesday 29 September 2015 12:55:31 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> ---
> src/copy-in-out.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/copy-in-out.c b/src/copy-in-out.c
> index 0dd8cd3..2b1e4d4 100644
> --- a/src/copy-in-out.c
> +++ b/src/copy-in-out.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ guestfs_impl_copy_in (guestfs_h *g, const char *localpath, const
char *remotedir
> char buf[buf_len];
> const char *dirname, *basename;
> CLEANUP_FREE char *tar_buf = NULL;
> + struct stat statbuf;
> +
> + if (stat (localpath, &statbuf) == -1) {
> + error (g, _("source '%s' does not exist (or cannot be
read)"), localpath);
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> int remote_is_dir = guestfs_is_dir (g, remotedir);
> if (remote_is_dir == -1)
NACK. See the patch series I just posted.
Would patch #2 be acceptable anyway, as simple starting check?
--
Pino Toscano