Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH nbdkit 0/7] server: Implement NBD_FLAG_CAN_MULTI_CONN.

Here are some more interesting numbers, concentrating on the memory plugin and RAM disks. All are done using 8 threads and multi-conn, on a single unloaded machine with 16 cores, using a Unix domain socket. (1) The memory plugin using the sparse array, as implemented upstream in 1.9.8: read: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec) write: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec) (2) I moved the locking to around calls to the sparse array code, and changed the thread model to parallel: read: IOPS=112k, BW=437MiB/s (458MB/s)(51.2GiB/120001msec) write: IOPS=112k, BW=437MiB/s (458MB/s)(51.2GiB/120001msec) (3) I reimplemented the memory plugin using a simple malloc, which is how it used to be in nbdkit <= 1.5.8: read: IOPS=133k, BW=518MiB/s (544MB/s)(60.7GiB/120002msec) write: IOPS=133k, BW=518MiB/s (543MB/s)(60.7GiB/120002msec) (4) I ran fio directly against /dev/shm to get some idea of how much performance we are losing by using NBD at all: read: IOPS=1018k, BW=3978MiB/s (4171MB/s)(466GiB/120001msec) write: IOPS=1018k, BW=3979MiB/s (4172MB/s)(466GiB/120001msec) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top