Hi Daniel,
On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the
>>> rpm_is_avaiable verification
>>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla).
>> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12
>> uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides, etc.
>> If rpm_is_available returns false, that means you built without librpm,
>> and that supermin will not really work. Did you tried running the test
>> suite (`make check`)?
>>
> These are the results of make check in the system I've used to test the
> patch. The system is
> in an internal isolated network, thus I believe some failures were
> expected to happen.
>
>
> PASS: test-basic.sh
> PASS: test-execstack.sh
> FAIL: test-build-bash.sh
> FAIL: test-binaries-exist.sh
> SKIP: test-harder.sh
> FAIL: test-build-bash-network.sh
> FAIL: test-binaries-exist-network.sh
> SKIP: test-harder-network.sh
> make[4]: Entering directory `/root/supermin/tests'
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/supermin/tests'
> ============================================================================
> Testsuite summary for supermin 5.1.12
> ============================================================================
> # TOTAL: 8
> # PASS: 2
> # SKIP: 2
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL: 4
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
>
> I've run the non-related network tests to see the failure cause. It is
> worth saying that supermin
> upstream code builds and runs fine as far as I can tell, thus I couldn't
> figure it out much reading
> these errors:
>
> # ./test-build-bash.sh
> ./test-build-bash.sh: line 34: 83872 Aborted ../src/supermin -v
> --prepare $USE_INSTALLED bash -o $d1
> # ./test-binaries-exist.sh
> ./test-binaries-exist.sh: line 29: 83886 Aborted ../src/supermin -v
> --prepare $USE_INSTALLED bash coreutils -o $d1
These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are
building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
#ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the
> rpm_is_available
> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal
> patch we used to add
> temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermin (the
> version shipped
> with RHEL 7.1 GA).
>
> I assumed that rpm_is_available failed because ibm-powerkvm does not
> have all the rpm features
> fedora and rhel have, although it uses rpm/yum. Perhaps in a later
> release of the OS, using
> a newer version of supermin, we should review this code and enhance it.
As I said, I'm pretty sure it's because you are building without
librpm, and you should have got in configure's output something like:
checking for LIBRPM... no
Please try the following:
- install rpm-devel (being a Fedora-based distro, you should have it)
- get supermin 5.1.12
- apply your ibm-powerkvm patch
- readd the rpm_is_available check (basically reverting [1])
- run ./configure and check that you have "LIBRPM... yes"
- build and run the test suite
If things work, you should get 6 tests passing and 2 skipped (we can
make these 2 working as well later).
[1]
https://github.com/libguestfs/supermin/commit/b2b0f29efb537161df0286f4a9d...
You are right. I've executed all the steps you mentioned and make check
now passes
(6 pass 2 skipped) and the original patch now detects ibm-powerkvm as well.
Trying to find out how I managed to not do something simple as intalling
rpm-devel, the
reasoning is that I've run yum-builddep with an older supermin.spec file
prior to building
supermin upstream code. This spec file I've used didn't include librpm
as a build
dependency and the project compiled without errors.