On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:45:33AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 10:36 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> IMO deleting anything is a bad idea, in particular, because a
> succefully
> completed script may cause the following ones to fail.
Well, I guess most of the users won't be aware of it and scripts will
probably stay there for ever.
I don't think it's a problem. We leave logs behind; the scripts are no
worse.
> The whole point of scripts_done is to preserve all the steps but
move
> them out of the way.
>
> I think the only controversial item is whether to move them to
> scripts_done on success only or regardless of the status: there are
> pros
> and cons either way.
The goal of moving the script to scripts_done BEFORE running was to
avoid running them twice if the system reboots in the middle of the
firstboot script.
Running them twice would be *desirable*. The problem would be if a
script is broken and *causes* the reboot: then it'd never quit the loop.
And I agree it outweighs all the rest so this part of your patch looks
good.
Roman.