9:16 a.m.
This adds package arch inspection for deb-based systems. The patch
returns package arch as given by dpkg, which means that it returns
'amd64' instead of 'x86_64', for example. Whether or not we should
standardize this to match rpm output is up for debate. I see other
places such as guestfs_file_architecture that use the rpm-style arch.
I can understand though where a user of guestfs inspecting deb-based
hosts would rather get back the "native" strings.
Thoughts?
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] lib: debian support for package arch inspection
---
src/inspect-apps.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/inspect-apps.c b/src/inspect-apps.c
index 9307eb2..ce4756d 100644
--- a/src/inspect-apps.c
+++ b/src/inspect-apps.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs)
FILE *fp = NULL;
char line[1024];
size_t len;
- char *name = NULL, *version = NULL, *release = NULL;
+ char *name = NULL, *version = NULL, *release = NULL, *arch = NULL;
int installed_flag = 0;
fp = fopen (status, "r");
@@ -450,14 +450,19 @@ list_applications_deb (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs)
release = NULL;
}
}
+ else if (STRPREFIX (line, "Architecture: ")) {
+ free (arch);
+ arch = safe_strdup (g, &line[14]);
+ }
else if (STREQ (line, "")) {
if (installed_flag && name && version)
add_application (g, apps, name, "", 0, version, release ? :
"",
- "", "", "", "",
"");
+ arch ? : "", "", "", "",
"");
free (name);
free (version);
free (release);
- name = version = release = NULL;
+ free (arch);
+ name = version = release = arch = NULL;
installed_flag = 0;
}
}
--
1.7.11.7
10:23 a.m.
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:16:35AM -0500, John Eckersberg wrote:
This adds package arch inspection for deb-based systems. The patch
returns package arch as given by dpkg, which means that it returns
'amd64' instead of 'x86_64', for example. Whether or not we should
standardize this to match rpm output is up for debate. I see other
places such as guestfs_file_architecture that use the rpm-style arch.
I can understand though where a user of guestfs inspecting deb-based
hosts would rather get back the "native" strings.
Thanks, ACKed and pushed.
I tend to agree with your decision to keep the native string, for the
following reasons:
- any attempt by libguestfs to rewrite these arch strings is
prone to go wrong for unexpected reasons
- avoids losing information
- the strings are not well-standardized anyway (eg. i386 vs i686)
so the caller may still want to do their own canonicalization
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v
4434
days inactive
4434
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
John Eckersberg -
Richard W.M. Jones