3 a.m.
[Let's keep all replies on the list]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:43:21AM -0500, Skippy VonDrake wrote:
Looks like that returned an empty array. Could the image be corrupt?
Here's the output:
# guestfish -v -x --ro -a /home/skippy/disk_images/[...]/old.img run : list-partitions
[...]
[ 0.558351] scsi2 : Virtio SCSI HBA
[ 0.560916] scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access QEMU QEMU HARDDISK
2.0. PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 0.562418] scsi 2:0:1:0: Direct-Access QEMU QEMU HARDDISK
2.0. PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 0.590401] sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
[ 0.592464] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] 4122952 512-byte logical blocks: (2.11
GB/1.96 GiB)
[ 0.594758] sd 2:0:1:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
[ 0.595840] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] 8388608 512-byte logical blocks: (4.29
GB/4.00 GiB)
[ 0.597380] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 0.598437] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 0.600092] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 0.601216] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 0.603609] sda:
The appliance kernel couldn't find any partitions at all on the disk.
Is it a raw format disk image, or some other format that qemu can
reasonably be expected to read?
If it is, then yes I'd say the image is corrupted. However you'd
probably want to hexdump it to see what's really going on.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
9:29 a.m.
New subject: does guestfs_list_partitions() work with Windows 95 images?
The appliance kernel couldn't find any partitions at all on the disk.
Is it a raw format disk image, or some other format that qemu can
reasonably be expected to read?
I used the "Advanced Options" of Macrium Reflect (on Windows 7) to do a raw
byte copy.
If it is, then yes I'd say the image is corrupted. However you'd
probably want to hexdump it to see what's really going on.
I looked at the first sector wondering if Macrium prepended its own stuff
but it looks like the start of a boot sector to me.
Offset(h) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0A 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F
00000000 EB 3E 90 4D 53 57 49 4E 34 2E 30 00 02 40 01 00 ë>.MSWIN4.0..@..
00000010 02 00 02 00 00 F8 FC 00 3F 00 40 00 3F 00 00 00 .....øü.?.@.?...
00000020 41 E0 3E 00 80 00 29 91 2C 95 24 20 20 20 20 20 Aà>.€.)‘,•$
00000030 20 20 20 20 20 20 46 41 54 31 36 20 20 20 F1 7D FAT16 ñ}
As for examining the rest of the image at the hex level and making an
assessment - that is beyond my scope of expertise.
But certainly it could have been corrupted.
I'll see if I can get access to the drive and use Linux (and dd) to make a
new image.
9:57 a.m.
New subject: does guestfs_list_partitions() work with Windows 95 images?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:29:25AM -0500, Skippy VonDrake wrote:
>
> The appliance kernel couldn't find any partitions at all on the disk.
>
> Is it a raw format disk image, or some other format that qemu can
> reasonably be expected to read?
I used the "Advanced Options" of Macrium Reflect (on Windows 7) to do a raw
byte copy.
If it is, then yes I'd say the image is corrupted. However you'd
> probably want to hexdump it to see what's really going on.
>
I looked at the first sector wondering if Macrium prepended its own stuff
but it looks like the start of a boot sector to me.
Offset(h) 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0A 0B 0C 0D 0E 0F
00000000 EB 3E 90 4D 53 57 49 4E 34 2E 30 00 02 40 01 00 ë>.MSWIN4.0..@..
00000010 02 00 02 00 00 F8 FC 00 3F 00 40 00 3F 00 00 00 .....øü.?.@.?...
00000020 41 E0 3E 00 80 00 29 91 2C 95 24 20 20 20 20 20 Aà>.€.)‘,•$
00000030 20 20 20 20 20 20 46 41 54 31 36 20 20 20 F1 7D FAT16 ñ}
Looks like a disk sector to me too. However the partition table
is further on. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#Sector_layout
Rich.
As for examining the rest of the image at the hex level and making
an
assessment - that is beyond my scope of expertise.
But certainly it could have been corrupted.
I'll see if I can get access to the drive and use Linux (and dd) to make a
new image.
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
10:33 a.m.
New subject: does guestfs_list_partitions() work with Windows 95 images?
Looks like a disk sector to me too. However the partition table
is further on. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#Sector_layout
So that reference says the "classical generic MBR" partition entry # 1 is
offset 0x1BE.
Which in this image is right in the error strings (?) section.
00000170 13 59 5A 58 72 09 40 75 01 42 03 5E 0B E2 CC C3 .YZXr.(a)u.B.^.xn--2cac0a
00000180 03 18 01 27 0D 0A 49 6E 76 61 6C 69 64 20 73 79 ...'..Invalid sy
00000190 73 74 65 6D 20 64 69 73 6B FF 0D 0A 44 69 73 6B stem diskÿ..Disk
000001A0 20 49 2F 4F 20 65 72 72 6F 72 FF 0D 0A 52 65 70 I/O errorÿ..Rep
000001B0 6C 61 63 65 20 74 68 65 20 64 69 73 6B 2C 20 61 lace the disk, a
000001C0 6E 64 20 74 68 65 6E 20 70 72 65 73 73 20 61 6E nd then press an
000001D0 79 20 6B 65 79 0D 0A 00 49 4F 20 20 20 20 20 20 y key...IO
000001E0 53 59 53 4D 53 44 4F 53 20 20 20 53 59 53 80 01 SYSMSDOS SYS€.
000001F0 00 57 49 4E 42 4F 4F 54 20 53 59 53 00 00 55 AA .WINBOOT SYS..Uª
00000200 F8 FF FF FF FF FF 04 00 FF FF 06 00 FF FF 08 00 øÿÿÿÿÿ..ÿÿ..ÿÿ..
So if that is where guestfish is looking for the partition table...
I searched for other references. Found this one and it agreed with this
0x1BE value.
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-2.html
Any other locations that you know of?
8:16 a.m.
New subject: does guestfs_list_partitions() work with Windows 95 images?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:33:00AM -0500, Skippy VonDrake wrote:
>
> Looks like a disk sector to me too. However the partition table
> is further on. See:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#Sector_layout
So that reference says the "classical generic MBR" partition entry # 1 is
offset 0x1BE.
Which in this image is right in the error strings (?) section.
00000170 13 59 5A 58 72 09 40 75 01 42 03 5E 0B E2 CC C3 .YZXr.(a)u.B.^.xn--2cac0a
00000180 03 18 01 27 0D 0A 49 6E 76 61 6C 69 64 20 73 79 ...'..Invalid sy
00000190 73 74 65 6D 20 64 69 73 6B FF 0D 0A 44 69 73 6B stem diskÿ..Disk
000001A0 20 49 2F 4F 20 65 72 72 6F 72 FF 0D 0A 52 65 70 I/O errorÿ..Rep
000001B0 6C 61 63 65 20 74 68 65 20 64 69 73 6B 2C 20 61 lace the disk, a
000001C0 6E 64 20 74 68 65 6E 20 70 72 65 73 73 20 61 6E nd then press an
000001D0 79 20 6B 65 79 0D 0A 00 49 4F 20 20 20 20 20 20 y key...IO
000001E0 53 59 53 4D 53 44 4F 53 20 20 20 53 59 53 80 01 SYSMSDOS SYS€.
000001F0 00 57 49 4E 42 4F 4F 54 20 53 59 53 00 00 55 AA .WINBOOT SYS..Uª
00000200 F8 FF FF FF FF FF 04 00 FF FF 06 00 FF FF 08 00 øÿÿÿÿÿ..ÿÿ..ÿÿ..
This doesn't look like any partition table I've seen before.
It's possible that the disk is not partitioned, ie. that what you've
got here is a straight filesystem. You could see if libguestfs can
mount it:
guestfish --ro -a disk.img -m /dev/sda
<fs> ll /
[...]
Any other locations that you know of?
There exist other kinds of partition table, but none that Win95 would
have known how to use.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
8:18 a.m.
New subject: does guestfs_list_partitions() work with Windows 95 images?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 02:16:09PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:33:00AM -0500, Skippy VonDrake wrote:
> >
> > Looks like a disk sector to me too. However the partition table
> > is further on. See:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_boot_record#Sector_layout
>
>
> So that reference says the "classical generic MBR" partition entry # 1 is
> offset 0x1BE.
> Which in this image is right in the error strings (?) section.
>
> 00000170 13 59 5A 58 72 09 40 75 01 42 03 5E 0B E2 CC C3 .YZXr.(a)u.B.^.xn--2cac0a
> 00000180 03 18 01 27 0D 0A 49 6E 76 61 6C 69 64 20 73 79 ...'..Invalid sy
> 00000190 73 74 65 6D 20 64 69 73 6B FF 0D 0A 44 69 73 6B stem diskÿ..Disk
> 000001A0 20 49 2F 4F 20 65 72 72 6F 72 FF 0D 0A 52 65 70 I/O errorÿ..Rep
> 000001B0 6C 61 63 65 20 74 68 65 20 64 69 73 6B 2C 20 61 lace the disk, a
> 000001C0 6E 64 20 74 68 65 6E 20 70 72 65 73 73 20 61 6E nd then press an
> 000001D0 79 20 6B 65 79 0D 0A 00 49 4F 20 20 20 20 20 20 y key...IO
> 000001E0 53 59 53 4D 53 44 4F 53 20 20 20 53 59 53 80 01 SYSMSDOS SYS€.
> 000001F0 00 57 49 4E 42 4F 4F 54 20 53 59 53 00 00 55 AA .WINBOOT SYS..Uª
> 00000200 F8 FF FF FF FF FF 04 00 FF FF 06 00 FF FF 08 00 øÿÿÿÿÿ..ÿÿ..ÿÿ..
This doesn't look like any partition table I've seen before.
It's possible that the disk is not partitioned, ie. that what you've
got here is a straight filesystem. You could see if libguestfs can
mount it:
guestfish --ro -a disk.img -m /dev/sda
><fs> ll /
The 'blkid' command might tell you what it actually is too.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
3630
days inactive
3631
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel P. Berrange -
Richard W.M. Jones -
Skippy VonDrake