On 08/17/22 23:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:37:00PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is that actually possible?  “fcntl (fd, F_GETFL) & O_WRONLY”
> should do it?
 
 So the answer is no as it's a kind of tri-state.
 
 I think this should work (untested)?
 
   r = fcntl (fd, F_GETFL);
   if (r == -1) ...
   r &= O_ACCMODE;
   if (r == O_RDONLY)
     h->can_write = false;
 
 There's also the case where r == O_WRONLY which the plugin (and NBD)
 cannot deal with.  Not sure what to do about that - error? 
(after a bit of reading POSIX):
I think a switch statement should handle these; O_RDONLY and O_RDWR
intuitively, everything else (O_EXEC, O_SEARCH, O_WRONLY) should be
rejected.
Laszlo