On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 18:46:37 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
v1 -> v2:
The first patch is the same (the pure refactoring), but in the second
patch I implement Eric Blake's suggested version.
LGTM -- can you please add Eric's text to the comment of is_zero, so
it is easier to remember why the 16-bytes trick is done?
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano