On Fri, Mar 28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I guess the question from me is why the user would want to use
zypper
from $PATH, instead of zypper which supermin had been configured and
tested against? Is it common that SUSE users want to try different
versions of zypper?
It might be a corner case, but in case one wants to use a specific
binary from PATH for testing its now required to rebuild either supermin
(and maybe libguestfs if it also uses AC_PATH_PROG). And its not
specific to zypper, any other binary would have the same issue.
For the time being the specfile now exports the full path to zypper.
Olaf