Re: [Libguestfs] Xen drivers for virt-builder images
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:12:46PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Not quite as easy as I imagined. However by using the attached patch
> I have managed to add the two Xen drivers to the initramfs. (I
> haven't been able to test that it boots in Xen however)
>
> I'm just building an updated Fedora 20 image which I'll upload later
> today.
The F20 image has been uploaded. You should notice when you install
it that it will download the full disk image again, and also that
a file "fedora-20.x86_64.2" will be created in ~/.cache/virt-builder/
(.2 == revision 2)
I tried various experiments, and it seems as if the Xen modules are
included in the initramfs even if you upgrade the kernel when running
virt-builder itself. So all looks good over here, but I didn't
actually try booting the disk image on Xen itself.
Right, well after managing to work around our corporate transparent
caching proxy to actually get the new version, I've tested it and it
works great. Thanks.
While I have your attention ...
It'd be great if libguestfs could use Xen as a backend (in addition to
current qemu, KVM and UML backends). Most likely that would involve
one of two approaches:
(1) Modify the libvirt backend (src/launch-libvirt.c) so it works
properly when the hypervisor is Xen. If you buy into libvirt, this
one is probably going to be less code.
(2) Add a new backend (src/launch-xl.c ?) which uses native Xen APIs
to create the appliance.
Considerations:
* libvirt has had basic libxl support for some time. I doubt you're
doing advanced things like migration or PCI pass-through, so I think
using a recent libvirt could be made to work without too much
difficulty.
* Depending on exactly what features you use, libvirt doesn't actually
abstract away the hypervisor details: you may need to have specific
options for Xen anyway. For example, you'll need to ask for Xen
devices rather than virtio devices.
* Still, it's probably a lot less code / testing to just use libvirt.
* But, it introduces another dependency that you need to have
installed in order to use virt-builder on xen.
* On the other hand, I suspect most distros will have a
libguestfs->libvirt dependency anyway.
So it seems like going with #1 is probably the best, overall.
-George
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs