On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:29:16AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Richard W.M. Jones:
> I would prefer either that we push all this stuff into libguestfs's
> init script, or (better) that we fix the Debian packages themselves so
> that any directories, device files etc that they need are listed in
> the packages already and not in separate scripts. (Fedora is just as
> culpable about this).
Since not many people seem to be involved and interested in hacking on
initrd systems, I think that fixing this in the distributions won't
exactly be a short-term effort.
A few short looks at dracut and mkinitcpio (Arch Linux) show that their
/init scripts perform essentially the same filesystem mount operations
as the /init script from Debian's initramfs-tools described earlier. (I
am not surprised.)
In Fedora, the same code is duplicated (with small differences/errors)
in at least 3 places: anaconda, mock, the live CD scripts. Plus
libguestfs if you want to count that. However this is definitely a
bug in Fedora, even if the maintainers won't fix it.
It should be easy to implement this in a few mount(2)
calls as part of febootstrap's /init. One could even use #ifdefs to cope
with slightly different behavior across distributions.
The problem is that we'll end up with complex conditional C code, when
really this is better and easier done in the shell script. The code
will also be different for every distro.
I think febootstrap would be more useful when used for other
purposes
than building a libguestfs appliance. And there is one less possibly
distribution-specific detail that needs to be coded into libguestfs.
Agreed. However I still don't think fixing this in febootstrap is the
right thing to do.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw