Re: [Libguestfs] Plans for nbdkit 1.18 release?

On 2/22/20 4:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >Another thing I've been thinking about for some time is splitting >.config_complete into .config_complete + .get_ready (new name TBD). >At the moment .config_complete is both the place where we finish >processing config, and also the last chance we get to set things up >before the server forks. Of course such a change would not be >material — .get_ready would always be run immediately after >.config_complete — but it cleans up the API a little. How would it play with --dump-config? Right now, we allow that to run after .config but before .config_complete, precisely so that language bindings can accept the first .config to determine their script name, and then consult the script for any further config help.