On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:35:01 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:43:15PM +0100, Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
> Added two new optional arguments to nsplit:
>
> * keep_empty: if set to false empty elements are not stored in the
> returned list. The default is to keep the empty elements
The ?keep_empty flag is pointless. It's simpler and more
clear to write:
List.filter ((<>) "") (nsplit ...)
when you don't want empty elements.
That's not entirely true when keep_empty is used in combination with
count. When keep_empty is false then the split is not considered a
(successful) split and internal state of count is not decreased.
Example:
# List.filter ((<>) "") (nsplit ~count:3 ","
"a,,,b,,,c,,d" ) ;;
- : string list = ["a"; "b,,,c,,d"]
# nsplit ~keep_empty:false ~count:3 "," "a,,,b,,,c,,d" ;;
- : string list = ["a"; "b"; "c"; ",d"]
However the ?count flag is fine, since that's what Perl's split
function also does.
> - let rec nsplit sep str =
> + let rec nsplit ?(keep_empty = true) ?(count = -1) sep str =
> let len = length str in
> let seplen = length sep in
> let i = find str sep in
> - if i = -1 then [str]
> + if i = -1 || count = 0 then
> + if str = "" && not keep_empty then [] else [str]
> else (
> let s' = sub str 0 i in
> let s'' = sub str (i+seplen) (len-i-seplen) in
> - s' :: nsplit sep s''
> + let elem, count =
> + if s' = "" && not keep_empty then
> + [], count
> + else
> + [s'], if count > 0 then count-1 else count
> + in
> + elem @ nsplit ~keep_empty:keep_empty ~count:count sep s''
You can write this line as:
elem @ nsplit ~count sep s''
(after dropping keep_empty).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.
http://libguestfs.org
--
Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi(a)redhat.com>