On 9/19/19 9:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Updates commit 5cdf4d6c89bdb802be234f2fccc8157b7228b546
and commit a6b88b195a959b17524d1c8353fd425d4891dc5f.
---
server/backend.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/server/backend.c b/server/backend.c
index 64dbf7d..6c102f9 100644
--- a/server/backend.c
+++ b/server/backend.c
@@ -209,8 +209,7 @@ backend_close (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn)
debug ("%s: close", b->name);
b->close (b, conn);
- memset (h, -1, sizeof *h);
- h->handle = NULL;
+ reset_b_conn_handle (h);
}
ACK. Needed because our mails have been crossing today :)
I'm in the process of backporting the assertion failure; branch-1.14 is
complete, branch-1.12 should be easier as it is closer to what
branch-1.14 used (neither branch has backend.c, and thus are not
impacted by the churn we've had here).
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org