Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] Fix building on architectures where ocamlopt is not available
* Richard W.M. Jones:
> I think that an extra target (mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma)
would make
> the .NOTPARALLEL unnecessary.
Right, I remember this was a problem now.
It was fixed by:
https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/dce94f3e266ed3f1fc634a1ef...
Do you think we could re-add the stamp-file / touch $@ ?
Sure, it would have to be modified so it still works if OCAMLOPT is not
available -- that's why I made that change in the first place.
Wouldn't a rule without commands such as
mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma
also prevent make from building the two targets in parallel?
Cheers,
-Hilko