On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 04:41:31PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:30:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:36:43PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
This filter doesn't call the next_open function in the non-TLS case, and therefore it never opens the plugin. This leaves the internal state of nbdkit a bit strange. There is no plugin context allocated, and the last filter in the chain has a context c_next pointer of NULL.
This works, provided we intercept every possible callback, check the non-TLS case, and prevent it from calling the next function (because it would dereference the NULL c_next).
To avoid a crash in backend_block_size we must therefore provide a .block_size callback in this filter. --- filters/tls-fallback/tls-fallback.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
ACK.
Would you like to squash this in, and/or have me commit this separately?
I was actually thinking about squashing my patches 1-4 together. They're all really the same change, but I kept them separate for ease of review. What do you think?
Seems reasonable (I'll confirm it again when I get through reviewing 4).
But I think this patch:
commit 8c00ca2fe418aeecf0818feed227a72e76d87f18 Author: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Date: Thu Feb 17 10:24:50 2022 -0600
tls-fallback: Enhance comments about required callbacks
... would stay separate, and you can push it before or after.
Before - it is now commit 8c00ca2f ;) -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org