Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH] fuse: provide a stub "flush" implementation (RHBZ#660687).
Hi,
On Thursday 12 December 2013 16:28:31 Pino Toscano wrote:
It seems that FUSE can invoke flush to make sure the pending changes
(e.g. to the attributes) of a file are set. Since a missing flush
implementation is handled as if it were returning ENOSYS, this can
cause issues later.
To overcome this, just provide a stub implementation which does
nothing, since we have nothing to do and don't want to have FUSE
error out.
Furthermore, uncomment the timestamp checks in test-fuse.sh, since now
they should be working fine.
Apparently this way not the right fix for rh#660687 (although the
addition of the patch did not harm). I should have hopefully found the
right cause of it, will follow-up with the fix.
--
Pino Toscano