On 2/24/23 23:59, Eric Blake wrote:
@@ -752,14 +742,15 @@ protocol_recv_request_send_reply (void) (cmd == NBD_CMD_READ || cmd == NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS)) { if (!error) { if (cmd == NBD_CMD_READ) - send_structured_reply_read (request.handle, cmd, buf, count, offset); + return send_structured_reply_read (request.handle, cmd, buf, count, + offset); else /* NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS */ - send_structured_reply_block_status (request.handle, cmd, flags, - count, offset, extents); + return send_structured_reply_block_status (request.handle, cmd, flags, + count, offset, extents); } else - send_structured_reply_error (request.handle, cmd, flags, error); + return send_structured_reply_error (request.handle, cmd, flags, error); } else - send_simple_reply (request.handle, cmd, flags, buf, count, error); + return send_simple_reply (request.handle, cmd, flags, buf, count, error); }
I think this would look better: if (!conn->structured_replies || (cmd != NBD_CMD_READ && cmd != NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS)) return send_simple_reply (request.handle, cmd, flags, buf, count, error); if (error) { return send_structured_reply_error (request.handle, cmd, flags, error); if (cmd == NBD_CMD_READ) return send_structured_reply_read (request.handle, cmd, buf, count, offset); /* NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS */ return send_structured_reply_block_status (request.handle, cmd, flags, count, offset, extents); Either way: Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>