On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:06:31PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
On 17/07/09 11:21, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IMHO doing this is a big mistake. This is what we did for virt-install and hugely regret it. Things just don't fall into a nice hierarchy. We are now looking at doing a flat list of distros + tagging/categorization relationships to be defined.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/2009-June/msg00018.html
Thanks, Dan.
What problems did you hit? I'm inclined to think I might get away with it for virt-v2v because we also have so much other additional info about the system. So far, 'redhat' pretty much means it uses rpm rather than anything else.
How about instead of "distrofamily" we add flags to tell us what we actually want to know: uses_rpm uses_dpkg Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw