On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 7:33 AM Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
On 6/17/20 6:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I pushed 2 & 3, thanks.
But ...
From 9fa3e443467e3c06761ec54241327e8daf8701ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:59:53 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add a Cargo.toml file to the top-level directory
This is necessary for other Rust projects to depend on unrelesed
unreleased
versions of the nbdkit crate.
As a meta-comment, it's easier to review patches sent inline, one patch per email, rather than multiple patches as opaque attachments to one email; the difference being that I can immediately reply to the patch in my mailer without having to open a file and pasting contents. git send-email makes it easy to send patch series in this way, if you want to figure out how to set that up. But it's not a showstopper if you keep your current workflow for submitting patches.
As a meta-comment, it would be a lot easier to review patches if you would accept PRs. If you're wary of Github's closed-source nature, why not Gitlab? It's easy to move a project from github to gitlab, and its PR system is in some ways even better. Personally, I don't think Github offers very much value at all if you eschew PRs. -Alan